Showing posts with label Montane Lakeland 100. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Montane Lakeland 100. Show all posts

Tuesday, 6 August 2013

Montane Lakeland 100 - The FULL Race Report - Getting it Right During the Preparation and on the Day

Hi,

I'm not really sure where to start this race report.  As mentioned within my quick update, last weekend I ran one of my most satisfying races for quite a while.  I have already written my 'brief' race report that describes my experiences whilst completing the 105 mile journey around the Lake District.  This report is available on the Montane website which you can access by clicking HERE.  However, what I hope to achieve within this FULL version of my race report is a bit of background into how I managed to run over two hours quicker than my 2010 winning Montane Lakeland 100 time, even though I am now three years older, and having also past the magical milestone of being 50 years old.  Warning, it could be an ultra length blog post. (Edit: Yes it IS an ultra length post!)  I hope it will contain some useful information on the various strategies I use, which although difficult to translate to ones own situation, as your experiences, qualities, traits are different to mine, the underlying principles, rather than the actual specifics should be transferable.  So enough rambling, lets get this report finally started!

Yes, I first raced the Montane Lakeland 100 back in 2010.  My number one goal for 2010 as the year commenced was to win the Runfurther Series (Click HERE to go to one of my posts to find out more about the Runfurther series), and with the Lakeland 100 race having a bonus 100 points (so I thought at the time, but the bonus points weren't actually allocated in 2010), to add onto the 1000 points one receives for the win, the plan was set.  It was simple, win the Montane Lakeland 100, combined with performing well in three other races, and the series win would be mine.

Now many of you may be thinking, how can I be so arrogant to think that back in 2010 I could just turn up to the Lakeland 100 and win it, baring in mind, that at the time I had never set foot in the Lake District!  There is one thing to have dreams of winning races, but if they are only a dream, then more than often they will not eventuate into reality.  One has to have the want, the desire to achieve a goal, but most important one must believe that if all went well, all went to plan, everything fell into place on that one day, then yes being totally honest with oneself , then this amazing challenging goal could be accomplished.  So I guess the first step in order to achieve is to set a goal that although it is very desirable, and achieving it will be very satisfying, you must believe that it is achievable.

Right, time to stop typing!!!  At this rate I can see this race report wont be finished before Christmas!  I think the above paragraph has started to illustrate that a lot of what I do that enables me to perform in ultra trail races isn't really 'rocket science'.  Everyone knows that one must set appropriate goals, SMART goals etc, So I think I will focus this report on those aspects that I do which may be different to what may be considered the norm.

Okay, take two, lets re-start this FULL race report.

It is now July 2012.  I have just finished the Montane Lakeland 100 in fifth place, in a time of 23:45:48 (Race report available HERE.)  Although I have improved on my winning time from 2010 by 25 minutes, I have been totally annihilated by Terry Conway, now two time winner and course record holder in the amazing quick time of 19:50:37.  I am not happy.  Not just with being beaten by nearly four hours, but more due to how I had performed during the previous 24 hours.  I knew inside, that in relation to what I feel I am capable of achieving, I had ran poorly, pretty well for the last 50 miles of the race.  There were many aspects that upon reflecting on deeply, with extensive analysing of the race, I was able to identify that caused my poor performance.  But more important was, what was I going to do about it! 

From the first time that I raced Ultra Trail Mont Blanc, way back in 2009, (finishing in 22nd place), I loved that event.  Then in 2010 after completing the Montane Lakeland 100, I loved this event to the same extent.  I however strongly believe it is not possible to race both of them well in the same year, being only five weeks apart.  I therefore set a long term plan, alternate between the races every year.  So I headed back out to UTMB in 2011 (DNF, race report available HERE), returned to Lakeland 100 in 2012, so I was scheduled to again race UTMB in 2013.  The added incentive in racing UTMB in 2013 was that I would also be 50 years old, so I could have a reasonable chance of winning the over 50 category.  But within days, maybe even within minutes of finishing my disappointing 2012 Lakeland 100 race last year, I decided to break the alternating sequence and return to Coniston exactly a year later in 2013.  The reason, simple, I had unfinished business that needed completing at the Montane Lakeland 100.  Yes, the thought of possibly winning the over 50 category at UTMB was very appealing, but I realised that this appeal was simply to satisfy my ego. 

The desire of winning the over 50 category at UTMB was a destination focused, ego satisfying goal, rather than a deep honest, true heart, true inner core, journey goal.   A journey goal is where what you achieve as you travel the journey is much, much more important.  In some ways the end result doesn't actually matter.  It is what you accomplish in getting to the end that is more important. My win back in 2010 was a good example of how even though I won the race by around an hour and a half, to be honest I was actually disappointed with the way I had run.  I felt I had underperformed, in relation to what I thought I was capable of.  Yes, it was a quickish time, yes I did win the race, but to me, my feelings were that I hadn't really extended myself, I hadn't got the best out of myself, I had 'wimped out' and had told myself that my running was fine, simply because I was leading the race, I was going to win it.  Yes, the win satisfied my ego, but it didn't satisfy my inner core, the real me!  That is what is truly important, being totally honest with oneself, being totally comfortable with yourself, simply giving it your best shot, and in reality only you can judge this, the results sheet often isn't the best judgement.

So pretty well immediately upon finish the Lakeland 100 last year my key focus race was set for 2013.  At that time in 2012, although I had that inner desire to sense that feeling that when I cross the finish line I am happy with the manner of my performance in getting there, a lot of the race goal for the 2013 Lakeland 100 when set in 2012 was also ego driven.  I wanted to win the race again!  The only problem was, how do I get to run nearly four hours quicker?  Drastic changes were going to be needed.

So around November 2012 I started planning for the 26th July 2013.  I calculated that if I did the same preparation, I would probably run maybe 30 minutes quicker, similar to my 2010 to 2012 time improvement, but this would still be more than three hours behind Terry Conway.  Yes, you can see that during these early stages of my preparation, I was ego / destination focused.  Thinking about the other competitors, thinking about the finish time, the finish place.  Anyway this way of thinking at the time was good, as it got me to make huge changes. 

I have always been a low mileage person, apart for 1984 when I ran a total of 2588 miles for the year, as I set out to achieve the magical sub 2 hours 30 minute marathon time.  I guess even with an average weekly mileage of 50 miles a week, it is still rather low mileage for a 2:30 marathoner.  Yes, I didn't achieve the sub 2:30 time, missing slightly with 2:30:39!  Anyway back to ultra trail running.  Yes, back in 2009, my 20 week average weekly mileage build-up for the 103 mile UTMB was 34.5 miles per week.  This enabled me to finish in 22nd place overall, around 15 minutes behind Scott Jurek, who finished in 19th place.  So I knew that I was able to perform to a reasonably high level on low mileage.  But that result was only 22nd, and chatting to Scott prior to the 2011 UTMB, he made it quite clear to me that his 2009 UTMB race was an extremely poor performance (Click HERE to my pre 2011 UTMB post.). He wouldn't run that poorly again.  So I guess that puts my 22nd place at the 2009 UTMB into perspective.  Maybe it isn't really possible to perform at the very highest level on low mileage. 

One of the main factors that I contributed my poor performance during the second half of the 2012 Lakeland 100 was the massive muscle damage to my legs.  They were pretty well 'trashed' from Dalemain, and so I accepted that this was the main reason why I drastically slowed over the last 46 miles.  Simple solution, run mega mileage like every other ultra trail runner, which would 'condition' the legs, and would therefore reduce the muscle damage, and allow me to maintain my pace better.  So instead of making a small change to my mileage, I upped it from I guess typically around 45 miles per week, to 100 miles per week.  Obviously not overnight, but over a period of three weeks and then held it at around 100 miles, as described in my Steyning Stinger race report back in March.  During March I raced two trail marathon, so the mileage dropped down a bit.  But pretty well leading right up to my Highland Fling race taper I was 'banging' out plenty of miles per week.

Amazingly I felt fantastic.  I didn't feel tired, I didn't feel over trained, motivation was high.  I was regularly seeing my physio Luke from Sportswise as prevention rather than waiting for an injury to develop due to doing more mile than I had ever trained.  I had also experimented with trying to increase my fat utilisation through carrying out all my long runs within an overnight fasted state.  I won't elaborate on this now, as I have touched on this a bit within my Endurancelife Sussex Coastal Trail Marathon race report, The key point is that I felt amazingly a lot better as a result of the fasted runs, and was finding it very comfortable running for four to five hours on only water!  So going into the UK Ultra Trail Championships, run in conjunction with the 53 mile Highland Fling, I was expecting a top performance.  Physically I was probably the fittest I had been for over 20 years.  I was the lightest I had been since I was 16 years old.  So what happened?

Yes, the Highland Fling was a big disappointment!  Come race day, it just 'didn't happen'!  And the worst thing of all, apart form not actually racing the event, i.e. never really getting into competitive mode, yes the worst thing was that although disappointed, I didn't seem to care.  I wasn't really devastated, I just seemed to accept it.  The writing of my Fling race report was the start of a huge self reflection.  I was facing a real dilemma.  At the age of fifty was it time to accept that my best running days were over, or was I still capable of more top quality performances.  Without really realising what I was doing, I typed within my Fling race report the following:
".... so in reality, I was never going to be able to perform to that level again.  My best running days were over!  I am now 50 years old.  Accept it, no 50 year olds are really still able to compete at the elite level."
I received some feedback following the publishing of my blogpost, commenting how disappointed the readers were, in that they were fifty years old, or of a similar age, and that prior to my Fling report, my running, my writing had given them inspiration, in that it was possible to defy the ageing process.  Now within my Fling report I was publicly stating that no, age will prevent me from running well.  As I mentioned following the Fling, I was in two minds, regarding my inner belief of what I was capable of, and what my future goals should be.  I could have remained within this undecided state for weeks.  But subconsciously typing the Fling report enabled me to resolve the dilemma.  A few days after I posted the report, I re-read what I had written.  And seeing the words I had written, down on the screen, as clear as day, in bold black and white was a real eye opener.  I didn't like what I was reading!  The stark reality of stating that I could no longer excel, just wasn't comfortable.  Immediately I knew I was not ready to leave my elite days.  I wasn't past it.  I could still perform!

So just as I was all set to really 'front up', and really get myself sorted for the Lakeland 100 in a little over 12 weeks time, I realised that physically things weren't right following the Fling.  I wasn't able to run comfortably, my whole left leg, the hip, my thigh, even sometimes my left foot/ankle just felt 'strange'.  And after a mile or two of running it got very uncomfortable.  I booked in to see my physio Luke at Sportswise, he had a reasonable idea what the problem was, so performed his magic, and I thought all would be fine.  But alas, for the first time in five years of being treated by Luke, the strange feeling, the pain was persisting.  I was finding myself getting really frustrated, especially since I had made the massive 'turn-around' and was more focused than ever to really get it right at the Lakeland 100 this time, with the date getting closer and closer.  I was then told by a trusted work colleague about a guy based just out of Hailsham, East Sussex, actually only 15 minutes drive from where I lived, who was equally as fantastic as Luke, but really specialises with muscular / neural pain, and he had done 'wonders' on my work colleague. I managed to book an appointment to give this new 'magical' physio guy a try.

So at around the middle/end of May, having run pretty well zilch for around three weeks, I have my first appointment with Greg Funnell from Optimum Muscle Care.  Seventy five minutes later I am full of optimism.  Greg is confident he can get me sorted.  We decide that me racing the 44 mile Endurancelife Classic Quarter in a few weeks time isn't wise, and that time is needed for the treatment he has performed to settle down. So it would be a little bit longer before I could start running again.  Not being able to carry out physical training, and being really fired up ready to train following my Highland Fling race report 'wake-up call', I go into 100 mile a week equivalent non-physical training.  I had already began to build up on my non-physical training once I had decided that I wasn't a 'has-been', as I had identified that prior to the Fling I had perhaps neglected this important aspect of race preparation.  I had put too much focus on my physical training, my high mileage, my new nutrition strategy.  I had gone up to Scotland simply expecting the race performance to happen, without doing my usual extensive non-physical training.  In essence I had become like most other endurance runners who put far too much emphasis on the physical.  So I went into mega non-physical training!

I guess readers of this blog are thinking "what is this non-physical training"?  I have touched on non-physical training at various times within my blog posts over the years.  Trying to find some of the material, my 2011 Beachy Head Marathon race report has some related material in relation to TOTAL training, with TOTAL training meaning a combination of the physical and the non-physical training.  Here is a paragraph I wrote then in specific reference to my Race Focus Energy (RFE) fatigue model:
My TOTAL preparation in order to maximise the size of my RFE tank on the start line is to spend many hours researching the race.  What are the demands of the race?:  Total Time, Distance, Profile, Terrain, Daylight/ Darkness, Navigation, Possible Weather, Temperature, Clothing, Feed Stations, Food, Dehydration, Backpack, Fellow Runners, Loneliness, Support, Family/Friends.  I also spend many hours researching myself: WHAT do I WANT?  WHY do I WANT IT?  HOW MUCH do I WANT IT?  Are these WANTS realistic, based on what evidence?
I also provide a bit more description of what I include as part of my non-physical training within my 2011 Endurancelife Dorset Trail Coastal Marathon race report.  Here are two paragraphs:
Leading up to the Dorset race extensive time was spent firstly clearly establishing answers to the initial three questions one has to answer when preparing for a race; What do I want? Why do I want it? How much do I want it? In order to answer these questions I had to be totally aware of what the race would entail, so then I would be able to determine / visualise how I would respond to the demands of the race. I therefore purchased an Ordinance Survey map, and transferred the course from the map downloaded from the website, onto the larger scaled map. The time spent doing this is a critical component of my preparation. It allows me to get ingrained into my subconscious the overall plan of the course, as if looking from above. I am therefore aware in what direction I should be heading, whether there are any 90degree turns, any out and backs, parts where we retrace the same path, etc. It basically gives me an overall feel of the route, at a deep level. During the race, just having this plan view of the course firmly ingrained, totally eliminated any doubt there could have been, just after the turnaround point where there was some confusion over which way to go. I simply referred to the visual image I had of the route map within my head, and was able to progress along the correct route, without there being any doubt at all, so thereby avoiding any upward swing of the RPE – RFE arrow (see previous Race Focus Energy posts).

In addition to marking the route on the map, I also carefully observe the number of contour lines I cross and the closeness of the lines, hence the steepness of the climbs. I also note the height at the peak of the climbs, so therefore get a feel for the elevation demands of the course. Further time is also spent trying to find photos of the area, which is combined with viewing the map, and a fly over the course on Google Earth, using the GPS file provided by the Endurancelife organisers on the website. The hours I spend doing this research / preparation, I consider are as beneficial, if not more beneficial to my performance than spending the same time running.

And finally a different aspect of non-physical preparation, and what I probably spent the majority of my 100 mile equivalent non-physical training weeks doing prior to the 2013 Lakeland 100, reading.  Yes, as simple as that, reading mainly auto-biographies of great sportspeople.  Here is a list of some of the books I read while in New Zealand last year, and it's effectiveness illustrated in a paragraph from a blogpost back in June 2012:
Whilst in New Zealand not being able to run, I also did quite a bit of reading.  I first read the autobiographies by some of New Zealand's great runners including, Jack Lovelock (1500m Gold in 1936 Olympics and World Record holder for mile and 1500m), Peter Snell (800m Gold in 1960 and 1964 Olympics, 1500m Gold in 1964 Olympics and World Record Holder for 800m and mile), John Walker (1500m Gold in 1976 Olympics and World Record holder for mile) and some other New Zealand runners less well known; Dick Taylor (10,000m Gold in 1974 Commonwealth Games beating David Bedford in a World Class time) and Anne Audain (3,000m Gold in 1982 Commonwealth Games, but more well known for being unbeaten on the roads in the United States for two years in the early eighties).  So I was discovering as much as I could from these great athletes.  They weren't ultra trail runners, but they understood about performing to the best of their ability, that just so happened to be the best, or near the best in the World.  What was really interesting was that similar themes/characteristics were common to them all.  I haven't got time to share them now, another post, but the key one that stood out was their inner belief in their ability, and that their preparation had been effective for their key goal race.
I also signed of that blog post with the following:
PPS Nearly signed off without a quote. Having read loads of books I have plenty to choose from, however, the quote from Chris McCormack - Awesome Australian Triathlete/Ironman - from his 2011 book titled "I'm Here to Win" has been quite relevant recently as I carry out my TOTAL training for the upcoming races:

"The mind game that takes place before the starting gun ever fires is really the critical point of a race.  It's when you have that good angel on one shoulder and a bad angel on the other.  One is saying "You can do it, mate!"  The other is whispering, "Why are you here? You can't win!"  The angel you decide to listen to will determine whether you are competitive or an also-ran.  There's always a voice in everyone's head saying "You haven't done the work, mate.  You know that track session you missed? It's coming back to get you on this hill."  That's what holds you back.  Each race is a new war against the evil angel! Mastering your own self doubts is the battle!"
And a second finally! I expand a little on the use of visualisations as part of non-physical training, within my 2012 Endurancelife Classic Quarter race report.  Although the visualisation here were different to what I performed this year leading up to last weekends Lakeland 100, as I no longer focus on specific opposition.  My goals now are simply about me, not actually about the opposition at all. Perform well. i.e. run to the level that I believe I am capable of, and the finish position will 'look after itself'!

Just before I finish this section on non-physical training, I'll just expand on how reading these sporting books assist.  As I read the sporting biography books, I have a pen and paper at hand, and I write down all of their great 'words of wisdom', (see photo below).  I am therefore able to access the most important, the most useful aspects of the book instantly without having to search through two to three hundred pages of the book.  I also find that writing down the key points, has a more lasting impact.  It helps me to associate with the message, to remember it, to relate their messages to my experiences.  Over the last five years I have read absolutely loads of sporting books, but if I had to name just one or two, the ones that I turned to the most, during these one hundred mile equivalent non-physical training weeks back in May and June, it would be Chris McCormack's I'm Here to Win, and Scott Jurek's Eat and Run.  These two books really stood out to me, and had a huge, I will repeat a HUGE, impact on my race preparation. 

The Key Messages from the Sports Books Noted Down

At the same time as I was reading my notes from all the books I had read, and re-reading the notes from these two books multiple, multiple times.  I also re-read my 2012 Montane Lakeland 100 race report, and also looked at my Garmin data for the race, which is accessible from the 2012 race report. A key thing that was apparent from my Garmin data was just how low my heart rate was from halfway through leg 8 until the battery run out on leg 11.  Following leg 11, I slowed even more, so the heart rate, the physiological intensity, would have been even lower!  This data wascombined with the overriding message from loads of athletes, but especially Chris McCormack and Scott Jurek, was just how important getting the right mind-set was in order to perform.  Here are just two examples from Scott Jurek:
"I knew that will wasn't just a matter of strength but a matter of focus.  The health of my body was critical to running an ultra.  But to run it well. my mind was what mattered."
"An ultra runner's mind is what matters more than anything. running ultra requires absolute confidence tempered with intense humility."

So I changed my evaluation of my 2012 Lakeland 100 relatively, based on what I feel I am capable of, poor performance.  I decided that simply 'blaming' my lack of mileage that led to my damaged leg muscles, which caused me to slow down wasn't correct.  The real blame was simply a poorly trained mind.  Poor goal setting, poor self belief, poor non-physical training.  The physical, the physiological wasn't really the problem.  And then to totally reinforce that I had finally found the correct cause of not performing to the level I believe I am capable of, I bought Kilian Jornet's Run or Die book, and it was FANTASTIC!  It was exactly what I needed to confirm that I was finally 'on the right track'.  That right track being simple; if I just sort out my mind, the top performance would eventuate.  It was such an uplifting feeling.  My performance was totally within my control.  All I had to do was get my mind sorted!  Again I'll just provide one example of Kilian's outstanding messages:
"I realise finally that the threshold isn't in my body or in my legs, I see now that I could have gone faster along the whole course.  Why had I put on the brakes?  It was my mind, my mind had led to lose concentration and motivation, had placed difficulties and obstacles in my path and blurred the image of the finish line, disorientating me and making me lose sight of my goal and my determination to get there, made me think it wasn't possible."

Reading this paragraph, I literally shouted out.  Yes, I am correct.  I have found the answer.  What Kilian is talking about is exactly what I encountered in the 2012 Lakeland 100.  Sort out my mind, and the performance will come.  And one last great message from Kilian:
"Winning isn't about finishing in first place.  It isn't about beating others.  It is about overcoming yourself overcoming your body, your limitations, and your fears.  Winning means surpassing yourself and turning your dreams into reality."

Reading Kilian's book allowed me to really get my race goals correct.  It wasn't about winning the race.  I already knew this, but I had replaced the winning goal, with a goal something vague like "running well".  But with a goal as vague as that, it proved useless during the actual races, to define what does 'running well' actually mean.  How do I evaluate myself during the race if I am 'running well' or not.  I now had my goal sorted. Simple.  Run without fear!  Run as hard and as fast as I am capable of, at the present moment.  Do NOT think about the whole race, as the enormity of the task of running 105 extremely demanding challenging miles will be too daunting, and will create fear, and therefore subconsciously slow me down, reduce my performance.  So I spent hour after hour to get me with the right mind-set to have no fear.  To not be afraid of running hard and fast.  After all, running 105 miles in a time of 19 hours and 50 minutes doesn't result in a very quick minute mile rate.  So when I am talking about running hard and fast, it is after all relative to the duration of the race.

So, following reading Kilian's book, I was happy.  No I was very, very, happy!  I knew what I had to do during the last six to eight weeks of training.  Remind myself of my race goals, get them formulated correctly deep down within my subconscious.  It was all totally within my control.  It was literally all in my mind.  With regards to the physical training.  Well, I have been running for over 35 years!  I have over 43,000 miles in my legs.  And to top that off, my physical training from December through to April was absolutely loads, more than I had ever done.  So I didn't really need to worry about the physical training between now and race day.

I have spent quite a bit above going on and on about this non-physical training, and how I see this as the key to my good performance last weekend.  I was totally convinced leading up to the race, and now having run the race I know my substantial improvement in performance over my 2012 race was due to having the right mind-set.  However, lets go back to my preparation though.

Many paragraphs above, I mention that I had seen Greg Funnell from Optimum Muscle Care.  Well I continued to see him around once a week.  I can't remember whether it was during my second or third visit, but Greg wanted to know what physical training I was planning to do over the next few weeks, as he wanted to check that I wasn't going to overstress my back, which was the root of my problem, and also the amount of training I was planning to do influenced the degree of manipulation/treatments he would carry out on me.  I remember replying to him saying something like "I don't intend to do any 'proper' ultra training.  I know what is required to perform on the day.  Physical training isn't important.  All you have to do is get me to that start line, being able to run freely and pain free and I will perform."  He first gave me a puzzled look.  He couldn't believe what I was saying!  Greg, two months earlier had successfully completed his first ultra trail race, the South Downs Way 50 miler.  And he like most ultra trail runners thought that the physical training attributed to the majority, if not most of the performance, with attitude, determination, motivation etc. simply making up the last few percent.  I repeated to him that the physical training wasn't that important, he started to realise that I was totally serious,  He then gave me a worried, anxious look, and replied "No pressure on me then!  I'd better ensure I get you running freely"

Over the last week, since I won the Montane Lakeland 100, I have found myself following the Lakeland 100 facebook page.  There have been a number of comments left on my facebook posts asking me for information of what training I was doing prior to the Lakeland 100.  A number of runners were wishing to either improve on their performance, or to move up from the Lakeland 50 to the Lakeland 100, so keen for some useful training tips.  So I will try to briefly summarise my physical training, having already extensively summarised my non-physical training above.

So below I will type out my weekly mileages for the last 13 weeks training leading up to the Lakeland 100.  To respond to the requests on facebook, but also to illustrate that perhaps increased emphasis on the non-physical training could also have a substantial impact on your running performances.   Please bear in mind, when you see the low running numbers presented below that there are two important overriding aspects to take into account; (i) my 43,000 miles in my legs, and (ii) the excellent physical training I did between December and April.  So although the physical training was at a low level over the final three months, I did have a fantastic level of background physical fitness. As I mentioned right at the very start of this blog, if you can remember that far back, the specifics of what I am able to do, are heavily influenced by my 35 years of running.  So it isn't easy to simply replicate the specifics, without knowing how your characteristics correlate with mine,.  rather instead try to identify the principles I am outlining.

So, lets look at my last 13 weeks of training, that includes the four days of the week prior to the race start on the Friday.  The weekly mileages were:  8, 0, 0, 0, 13, 4, 30, 27, 42, 50, 69, 45, 9.  Giving a grand total of 297 miles at an average of 23 miles per week for the 13 weeks, or more representative an average of 39 miles per week for the 7 weeks of training once I got over my injury.  What was the intensity then?  Every single run was at a relaxed easy pace, probably around 8 min to 9 minute per mile pace.  What about the terrain?  The majority of the runs were flat / undulating runs, with the longest continuous climb being 100 vertical metres.  Nearly all runs were off road, but the under foot conditions were smooth, dry grassland, dirt tracks.  Why, such non strenuous training?  Well, because I had such an enormous physical background, mega, mega miles in the legs, combined with the realisation that my relatively poor performance during 2012 Lakeland 100 wasn't mainly physically caused but was more likely to be mentally caused, resulted in me simply wanting to just enjoy the rhythm, the relaxation, the smoothness, of running.  I guess in some ways I was doing a massive 13 week taper.  In terms of the distance of my runs, during these weeks, I run three runs longer that 11 miles.  These being a 13 miler, a 14 miler, and then two weekends out from race day, I ran a 23 miler along the North Downs Way, an out and back over the last section of the NDW50, just as a test, to reassure myself that I could actually run further than 14 miles, bearing in mind that I had to race 105 extremely challenging miles two weeks later in the Lake District.

Within my 'brief' race report available on the Montane website, I made the comment that "I was satisfied with my preparation".  Yes, although I missed six weeks of running, and my weekly mileage was pretty low during my seven weeks of running prior to race day.  As a result of the extensive non-physical training, and getting my mind-set totally in order.  I was more than satisfied with my preparation.  Probably the most satisfied I had ever been.  Once I had got back into running, with exactly seven weeks before race day.  I dug out my training diaries from the previous five years, and noted all of the seven week build-ups to my more successful races during these years.  I then used this information to help me decide upon just how much physical training I should attempt to complete.  Luckily, there were quite a few races where I had performed well, with weekly mileages during the last seven weeks of only in the thirties.  This reassurance that 35 miles a week was plenty enough miles in order to perform helped in making me feel more than satisfied with the physical training I had completed.  The photo below illustrates the extensive time I spent reviewing training diaries and making notes.

Planning the Seven Week Physical Training - Reflecting on Previous successful Build-ups

One last bit of essential preparation I carried out was also to do with the kit to use on race day.  Being a Montane athlete I am fortunate that I have the best, lightweight kit available to me, but in terms of other kit to carry, I got mega obsessive regarding weight.  I was weighting drink bottles, gloves, hats, first aid kits, safety blankets, etc. in order to reduce the weight I was carrying as much as possible.  I also decided that using a hydration bladder wasn't the best approach.  The reason for this is that because to refill the bladder one as to remove the back pack, and fiddle around with the bladder opening, carrying less than one litre of water, so one kilogramme would waste too much time refilling.  However how many legs would it take to consume one litre of water on the Friday evening, probably around 4 or 5 legs.  So it means you are carrying some water for possibly six hours.  So I splashed out and purchase the newly released Ultimate Direction Scott Jurek Hydration Vest.  Rather than using an Ultimate Direction drink bottle that came with the pack that weighed 80 grammes, I used an Endurancelife drink bottle that only weighed 56 grammes.  A saving of 24 grammes!  In addition I only carried one 600 ml bottle and used the other bottle pouch to carry my gels.  Carrying the water in the clear bottle I would also always be aware of how much water was left, so I would know whether to fill up at the current checkpoint or there would be sufficient to get through to the following checkpoint.  My wife thought I had really 'loss the plot'.  Me, I was really pleased with myself.  I felt as though I was the David Brailsford (British Cycling guru) of ultra trail running.  Accumulating all of the marginal gains, in order to make a big difference to performance!

So FINALLY, I hear you shouting at me, lets get to race day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Living in East Sussex it is a long journey, so I left Thursday afternoon and travelled to Worcestershire to stay the night with long time friends Jane and Gary.  My family, Frances and our two boys Robert and Chris, after watching me 'suffer' at the 2010 Montane Lakeland 100, no longer travel with me to races. (Click HERE to go to a video of the 2010 race on YouTube, at around the six minute mark, the suffering is evident.  The fact that I pretty well brush my two boys aside, without even acknowledging them also did not go down too well!)  But I knew they would be tracking me intently via the web live tracking, so although they wouldn't be there in person in the Lake District, I was still able to receive their positivity and support through knowing that they would be aware of how I was performing during the race.  As I mentioned in my brief report, this aspect of knowing friends and family were following me each time I dibbed my dibber was a huge source of positive energy during the race.

So race morning I complete the journey to the Lake District.  By the time I arrived in Ambleside I was nearly up to date with my Talk Ultra podcast episodes, after a total of nearly seven hours of listening.  Just a quick aside, I have been a fan of Talk Ultra since episode one, and although the podcasts are quite ultra in length, so I often find that I end up being a few episodes behind, on the whole they are excellent.  Listening to the interviews, similar to reading sporting books, one is able to learn from the elite.  One particular point I really enjoyed this year was British ultra runner Ian Sharman's performance at Western States where he finished an awesome fourth place.  During his interview it was commented that "he had been off the radar", keeping quiet, so no one was aware of what he was up to, so he was able to shock them all with a great performance.  As I listened to this, I thought, yes, great.  That can be me.  Having gone into 'hiding' since the beginning of May, no blogging, no facebook, no e-mails etc. I thought yes, my preparation is ideal.  I'll come out of the wood work just like Ian Sharman and surprise everyone. 

Basically I was turning every tiny, tiny aspect possible into a positive for a good performance.  One other positive example, was when on Friday morning I realised that I had left my Garmin 310 GPS watch at home.  I try not to look at my watch during the actual race, but I do like to have access to the data following the race, to try to identify strengths and weaknesses.  Upon realising I didn't have my GPS watch, I thought back to the last race I didn't wear it.  The 2011 IAU World Ultra Trail Championships, where the wearing of GPS watches was banned.  I immediately turned this into another positive.  My race at the Worlds was probably my best running performance to date.  Maybe I performed so well at the Worlds because I wasn't wearing the GPS watch / heart rate monitor.  Conclusion, tonight's Lakeland 100 race was going to be another great performance.  Throughout the lead up to the start of the race, and during the actual race, any tiny incident, I would immediately turn it into a positive.  Reflecting back now, it was unbelievable just how many potentially negative aspects were turned into a positive.  I'll mention one or two more possibly, but the length of this post is already getting out of hand!

I arrive in Ambleside and have no problems finding a car park (good omen) and an excellent café which was serving lasagne, which I had decided in advance would be the ideal last meal at around 1:00pm (another good sign).  While eating my meal, I am re-reading my notes from Chris McCormack's, Scott Jurek's, and Kilian Jornet's books.  I also have my race schedule for the 15 legs, which is set to achieve a finish time of 19:45, also indicating when I was to consume the TORQ gels that I was racing on this year. (See photo below).  The schedule was set to be five minutes quicker than Terry Conway's 2012 winning time.  Deep down, I didn't really expect to be able to hold myself to the schedule for the entire 105 miles.  But my attitude was, that 'I was going to go down fighting'!  I would start at that pace, WITH NO FEAR, and just see how many legs I could hold it for.  I wasn't specifically focusing on beating Terry.  All I was focusing on was giving absolutely everything, to run as fast as I could at each moment in time.  Trying to ignore the reality that the race was 105 miles in length.

The 19:45 Race Schedule with Planned TORQ Gel Timings from Start to Dalemain

Specific to this point, during my non-physical training, I spent hours convincing myself that the race was only 59 miles, only to checkpoint 8, i.e. Dalemain.  The reason for this is tied into my Race Focus Energy (RFE) Fatigue Model, where the anticipated duration of the race has a large impact on ones rating of perceived exertion (RPE).  If I was able to get into my sub-conscious that the race was only to checkpoint 8, then I would be able to run heaps faster.  My plan therefore was to try to treat the race as a 59 miler, therefore I would be able to race so much quicker to checkpoint 8.  What would happen at checkpoint 8 then, surely I would be absolutely stuffed?  I gave this some thought and decided that I would 'cross that bridge when I got to it'. remember NO FEAR.  I also hoped that I would be absolutely buzzing due to getting to Dalemain so quickly, that the 'buzz' would carry me the last tiny bit, i.e. the last 46 miles.  Yes, a rather bizarre and possibly foolish plan, but I was willing to give it a go!

As I leave the café and am heading back to my car, I bump into running friends Simon Deakin (Hardmoors 110 winner this year) and who is running the Lakeland 50, and Paul Tierney (2nd Lakeland 100 2012).  Paul looks at my clip board and asks what's all the paperwork.  My race schedule is on the top.  I instantly remove the clip board out of his sight, knowing that I am going to be racing him in a few hours, I don't want him to know my plan, i.e. to go out really hard and fast.  As I drop all my papers onto the ground, he states, "Relax, I not racing tonight."  He explains that he has had a few niggles and is wanting to save himself for UTMB in five weeks time.  I am therefore able to openly discuss with Simon and Paul my plans for the race, these being my no fear attitude, and the belief that I will finally be able to actually put into action the lessons I learnt from previous races, especially the 'devastating' UTMB DNF.  Paul then mentioned that Terry Conway up until the previous day wasn't going to race the Lakeland 100 this year due to getting over an illness, but had changed his mind only yesterday, on Thursday, that he would start.  Not that I was focusing on any specific opposition as my focus was on me, but I did think to myself about the extent of my non-physical preparation I had carried out in order to have the correct mind-set come race day, and thought that Terry with the uncertainty all week of would he, wouldn't he race, that his mind would not really be in the ideal place.  Again, another positive I 'banked' into my mind when comparing the extreme contrasts in mental preparations.

Finally I am on the start line, enjoying the glorious sunshine, and quietly chatting to a few other runners.  I am calm.  I am relaxed.  I am focused to enjoy every moment during that moment.  If you wish to see the exact opposite of where I was at in terms of attitude and relaxation on the Lakeland 100 start line, simply look at the top photo of me on the start line at the 2011 Ultra Trail Mont Blanc race  within my UTMB race report.  It's pretty obvious from even before I started UTMB that a DNF was 'on the cards'!  Click HERE to view a short video of the 2013 Lakeland 100 start and other small portions of the race.

Relaxed and Calm on the Start Line

The race starts, and most of my experiences have been described within my brief race report available on the Montane website.  But basically everything starts off to plan.  Although I have planned a 19:45 race schedule I have actually only memorised the first three checkpoint times.  I am reasonably confident that I can run to the required schedule for at least three legs, and am hoping that if all went well maybe even keep to schedule for all eight legs to Dalemain.  I don't really try to remember the other checkpoint times, because I really want to run by feel.  I simply want to run as hard as I can.  So I am puffing and blowing the entire journey.  If I find that I am not working hard enough, the plan is to simply increase the intensity.  After all, my race goal is to simply give it everything, in some ways to race myself to a collapse, although I am well aware that the safety mechanism within the body and mind won't allow this to happen, no matter how hard I push.  So I am pretty comfortable that I can push as hard as I want and am content that the over protective safety mechanism will prevent me from doing any harm!

Running Fast from the Start Line

Running Side by Side with Ken Sutor - Moving Away from the Field
Running Fast During Leg 1

Working Hard up Walna Scar Road During Leg 1
I reach the first checkpoint in 61 minutes, two minutes up on schedule.  Although I am in second place I am not one tiny bit concerned.  The race today is about me.  Focus on me, and my finish position will 'look after itself'.  A quick in and out to dib, and I am now level with Ken Sutor, but quickly move ahead of him and am running on my own.  Ken re-joins me on some technical descents.  One thing I'll mention here is that on the first descent off Walna Scar Road, I actually eased off the pace from my usual at times 'suicidal' pace that I had adopted in 2010 and 2012.  I purposely slowed my descent as I felt that possibly some of the damaged muscles I suffered with later on in the race in previous years was due to descending on leg 1 too fast.  So getting to checkpoint 1, two minutes up, even after I had taken it pretty easy on the downhill was another massive positive! 

Anyway back to the race, Ken and I approach Boot together. Whilst racing as we near Boot I recall that during the 2012 race, I never dibbed my dibber first at any of the checkpoints, so according to the leg split times I was never in the lead.  Also back in 2012, during leg 3 I was caught up by the group of three running together, who went on to fill the podium, Terry Conway, Paul Tierney and Barry Murray.  Not knowing how far Terry Conway was behind, I was conscious that the same could happen again, I could get caught by the runners from behind on leg 3.  So this upcoming checkpoint could be my only chance to be recorded on the results sheet, and to be seen by all my family and friends all around the World, that I am actually leading the race.  So rather than being a 'bit of a dork' and making a big deal of getting my dibber in first if we run into the checkpoint together, I decide that I will make a move now, about 400 metres out, so my dib first plan isn't obvious.  I therefore significant increase the pace, and that is the last I see of Ken.  I dib, and I am still two minutes up on schedule.  Excellent, all to plan.

I quickly make my way to the next checkpoint at Wasdale Head, I am still one minute ahead of schedule.  Fantastic, everything is falling into place.  Up and over the climbs to Buttermere, checkpoint 4, and by this time it is now dark, and I can't remember what the schedule split was meant to be.  I am quickly in and out of the checkpoint and there is absolutely no sign of any following torches.  It feels like I have eased off the pace a bit, but I accept that the concept of going really hard the entire way was rather flawed, so accept reality and allow my intensity to drop.

As I make my way over the next big climb before dropping into Braithwaite I see a few following torches.  It is really hard to gauge distances especially when running up hill, and with the many little stream valleys you have to run in and out off along this section of the course.  I remind myself to ignore the other runners.  Tonight is all about me, whether they catch me or not is out of my control. To be honest, I thought they would catch me.  Knowing that I had eased off the pace a bit during leg 4, I was thinking it would only be a matter time.

I dib in at checkpoint five and race time is 6:01.  For some reason I had in my head that I thought that my schedule split was 6:00.  The advantages of not clearly remembering the split times now become apparent  There is actually no need to know all of the schedule split times.  It is good for the first leg or two, just to check that one is on track.  But after that it is better to try to run by feel.  It felt that I was achieving my goal of pushing myself as hard as was really possible for a 59(!) mile race.  So knowing whether up or down on the schedule at this point of the race isn't going to really make any difference.  Why bother going to the trouble of spending hours calculating the scheduled leg times then, I hear you asking?  Well it is all part of the non-physical training.  These scheduled times, that are obviously quite fast and therefore result in an overall shorter race time duration, will enter the subconscious and therefore result in the race having a planned shorter duration.  Which will reduce the level of rating of perceived exertion (RPE) for the same running pace, compared to if one hadn't carried out this important non-physical training. 

Anyway I leave Braithwaite absolutely buzzing, thinking that I had only lost one minute from my extremely ambitious 19:45 schedule.  I conclude that I am running 'on fire'.  Little did I know that over legs 4 and 5 I had actually lost 19 minutes from my schedule, and that second place runner Ed Batty had gained five minutes on me over these two legs.  One bit of positive news I did receive at Braithwaite, was that Terry Conway had pulled out back at Buttermere.  With that bit of news, for the first time during the race I actually started to think that I could possibly win the race.  I quickly shouted out loud to myself "One leg at a time!  Focus on this leg.  Stay within the present moment.  Enjoy this moment, now, during this moment".  During the race, I must have shouted this to myself verbally out loud probably around twenty times.  It was so important not to let the mind start getting ahead of itself, and therefore missing the enjoyment from the present moment.  I find that to stay within the present moment is actually quite hard to do.  It is something I have been really working on during my races.  For the first time I was really pleased with the manner in which I did remain present.  I definitely think the chanting to myself worked.

Leg six flies by, as does the first half of leg seven.  Then as I get over the crest of the Old Coach Road, where it is then either pretty flat or slightly downhill, it feels like I am absolutely 'creeping'.  I am really pleased that I don't have my Garmin GPS watch on, so I am unable to see just how slow I am running.  It feels like I am running around 9:00 - 9:30 minute mile pace.  On this terrain, I feel that I should be able to run at 7:30 - 8:00 minute mile pace.  So I calculate that for every mile I am losing 1:30 - 2:00 minutes.  I struggle into checkpoint seven, a big marquee.  Immediately upon entering the marquee I sense the energy, the positivity, there is a real buzz within the area.  Up to this point the duration of my stay at the checkpoints had been minuscule, definitively less than two minutes, for most checkpoints less than a minute.  I take in the positivity, and combined with my calculation of losing nearly two minutes a mile if I continue running, I decide to sit down and simply 'chill out'!  Leg 8 is a long leg of 10.1 miles, that includes loads of runnable terrain.  Probably the fastest leg on the course.  Running slowly over this leg would be a massive waste of time.  I do some calculations.  Even if I stay at the checkpoint for ten minutes, as long as I am running back to normal on departure, ten miles gaining two minutes a mile, would equal twenty minutes, subtract the ten minute checkpoint stop, I would still gain ten minutes. Click!  Another massive positive is bagged.  Yes by stopping, by resting for up to ten minutes here within this checkpoint, I will gain ten minutes.  Reflecting on this now, it absolutely amazes me how my mind-set was so positively framed that anything that occurred could be turned into a positive.

So I stay seated in the chair, typically in past ultra trail races I would never ever sit down during the race, scared that my quads would seize up upon trying to stand.  Martin from the Sport Ident timing company was at each of the checkpoints making sure the dibbers were all working prior to the lead runners arrival.  I got to know Martin during the 2010 event, and it was great to meet and chat to him again at each of the checkpoints this year.  Martin had noticed that at each of the checkpoints I refused any food, and simply consumed one of my TORQ gels.  While I was seated trying to get my body and mind working in harmony again before departing, he looked me in the eye and said "Stuart, I think it's time to move off the gels and consume some real food".  In between the 2010 race and this year's race I discovered that Martin from Sport Ident was actually Martin Stone, an ex awesome trail runner who won the inaugural Dragons Back race way back in 1992.  I therefore had huge respect for his judgement.  I listened to his advice and decided that it was good advice.  Up to that point I had stuck religiously to my TORQ gel consuming schedule, and had consumed eleven gels without any problems, but some non gel fuel could just give me the boost I needed.  Not that I thought my struggling was nutrition related.  In all of my previous 100 mile races, at around the same time, at around 3:00 - 4:00 am in the morning, I have struggled with the mind wanting to switch off, I lose race focus.  So I think possible it is simply a time of night issue.  Anyway I eat some biscuits, drink some warm coffee and really enjoy the banter from the ten or so checkpoint volunteers.  They were trying to wind me up about my whinging about how slow I was running.  It was great energy.  I left the checkpoint after about nine minutes, pretty well a totally revitalised runner!

I wasn't sure of the exact duration of the time of my stay, but it felt like a little under ten minute, my planned stop in order to gain ten minutes for the following leg.  Around a minute after I left, I heard the cheers and clapping as the volunteers clapped in and gave the same huge welcome to Ed Batty, the runner still in second place.  The results show that I arrived at the checkpoint ten minutes before Ed, hence the nine minute stop!  As I started running along leg eight, which luckily starts with a one mile gentle downhill along a sealed road.  I recalled listening to an Ellie Greenwood interview on a Talk Ultra podcast where during her Western States win, she had a really difficult patch, was sick and was stationary at one of the checkpoints for ages.  She went on to win the race, so I started thinking I could do the same.  But before I let my mind wander to much into the future I repeated to myself my chant "one leg at a time".  Leg eight was fantastic, I was back 'on fire again', and I was really pleased at the pace I was running over the fast sections.  I didn't know what the time gap was back to the second runner, but feeling that I was running well, even though depending upon how long Ed had stayed at checkpoint point seven, he wouldn't be too far behind me, I didn't really care.  I was happy with the pace I was running at.  I was still pushing myself slightly out of the comfort zone, even though the pace had slowed quite a bit since the early legs.  I knew I had drifted quite a bit of my 19:45 schedule, but I was pleased with the level of my Race Focus Energy.  Note, the results later showed that during leg eight I actually did manage to gain elevens minutes on Ed.  Amazingly exactly as I had predicted whilst 'chilling out' at checkpoint eight, unreal!

Leg 9 goes pretty smoothly, I run all of the climb up out of Pooley Bridge.  Not at a very fast pace, but not walking up this incline I took as a massive positive.  Leg 10 doesn't go so well.  I begin to struggle up the biggest climb on the entire route.  I also start finding myself looking behind a lot more,  Searching out to see what my lead is over the second place runner.  I am losing my 'stay within the present moment' focus.  My mind is wandering, my pace slows!  I eventually manage to get to Mardale Head to another fantastic welcome.  The checkpoint is manned by the Delamare Sparten running club.  Back in 2011 they invited me up to their club to do a talk.  It was a great weekend and I recognise a few of the faces.  They all know me, which is a good boost to the ego.  Following my difficult leg 10 I was definitely in need of a boost.

Mardale Head Checkpoint - Concentrating Hard to be Fully Focused  for the Next Leg

Mardale Head Checkpoint - All Smiles as I Receive the Positivity from the Delamare Spartens

I am no longer 'on fire' as I leave the checkpoint, and I walk out to start the huge climb.  Again I focus too much on the runner behind, and from half way up the hill I see him, and clock the time he arrives at the checkpoint behind me, which I calculate is around fifteen minutes.  Knowing that I had probably stopped for around six to seven minutes, I am keen to see what the duration of his stop is at checkpoint ten.  As I lose sight of the start of the climb, fifteen minutes has passed and he hasn't appeared.  I conclude that he has therefore had a lengthy stay like me, and since he hadn't appeared, it could be who knows, many minutes longer than my stop.  Conclusion, he is in a worse state than me! 

During leg 11 my running pace slows dramatically.  The reason for the slowing of my pace isn't really clear.  Could be due to one of many reasons, but I think most likely due to a wandering mind.  I don't know it at the time but I lose during leg 11, which is only 6.5 miles in length, seven minutes to Richie Cunningham, which follows on from losing on the long previous leg, leg 10, eight minutes to Richie.  Whilst at the Kentmere checkpoint at the end of leg 11, I am informed that at Mardale Head, i.e. the previous checkpoint, that Richie was in third place, 38 minutes behind me.  I have raced Richie four times previously, having beaten him every time, but often it is quite close.  More significant though is that usually when analysing the leg split time data, he always out runs me over the final leg, which occurred at this year's Highland Fling where I finished 8th and Richie was a close 11th.  Again I started doing calculations in my head.  Thinking about when would he pull me in, as he always finishes strong, and the pace I was going was pretty slow.  It felt slow, and the actual results confirm this.  In terms of leg split time rankings, leg 11 was relatively my worst leg, managing to only obtain the twelfth quickest time for the leg, (see table and graph below).  Yes, I was running relatively slow, and I knew it.  My buzz had gone.  I was struggling to find any positivity.

Race Leg Split Time Rankings Table

Race Leg Split Time Rankings Graph

Leg 12 starts of even worse than leg 11.  I have lost my self focus.  I am struggling.  I walk out of the checkpoint, and although it is flat I continue to walk the 400 metres or so until the climb starts.  Then on sections when the climb flattens I continue walking!  Things are getting grim.  All the time in my head I am simply thinking of being caught!  On the descent into Trout Beck I start to regain my focus.  I start to refocus my mind on me, what I am doing.  I recognise what I have been doing wrong for the last two legs, i.e. thinking about the other runners, thinking about the end result and really start shouting to myself to focus on me.  "Be within the present moment."  Control the wandering mind.  I think to myself, "I know what I should be doing, come on lets do it."  Then just as I am finally getting back in control of things as I pass through the woods above Ambleside, I meet good friend John Kynaston, (the man responsible for starting me on my blogging path), running towards me.  He notices that I am struggling a wee bit, and shouts to me to remain positive, to focus on the positivity.  He is telling me my own 'words of wisdom'.  It just confirms that I do know what to do, I simply have to put it into action.  I think from that moment on I get pretty well back on track.  Within an instant I am back on task, race focus back in place, and my pace quickens.

Approaching the Ambleside Checkpoint


I enter the checkpoint at Ambleside and friend Paul Tierney is cheering me on.  He then comes into the check point and sits down opposite me, as again I am sitting down, as I have at every checkpoint since checkpoint seven.  My new strategy, possibly lose a bit of time at the checkpoint, but gain it in the following leg by running faster.  He sits opposite me and calmly says something like "If you get a move on, and not waste time here, you can win this race for a second time.  And that would be absolutely amazing!".  I recall thinking to myself, yes I realise that, I know that it would be pretty amazing, but don't worry, I've got it under control, I'm back on task, and I simply going to 'hammer myself' from here on in, and if Richie or whoever is going to beat me, it will because they are simply stronger than me, not because I performed poorly.  Yes, although I was running scared.  Not liking the idea of being 'hunted down' by the chasing runners, I was now focusing on me, and more importantly I was now staying within the present moment.

The last three legs are described in detail within my brief race report on the Montane website.  I eventually reach the finish line in Coniston, having achievable my goal.  My goal wasn't about winning, that was never the goal.  My goal, which I feel as though I have achieved, was about giving everything out on the course. Click HERE to view a video on YouTube which shows me finishing at around the five minute mark into the video. Crossing the finish line in such an exhausted state, I must say was one of the most satisfying feelings I have had from my ultra trail racing.  So overall my 2013 Montane Lakeland 100 performance was very, very satisfying.  And yes, the win was also a bonus.  A good boost to my ego.

My Time Gap Lead Over Other Runners at Each Checkpoint During the Race


Approaching the Finish at Coniston

The Large Crowd Welcomes me to the Finish

Crossing the Finish Line

Struggling to Stay Upright!

Phew!  I have finally made it to the finish of this race report!  I did warn you at the start that it would be an ultra length post!  To those of you that have managed to survive the journey of this race report, hopefully you have found some useful bits of information that will improve your ultra trail running. 

Over the last week I having spent some time on the Lakeland 100 facebook page reading peoples comments about their race and also finding most of the above photos.  (Sorry I can't acknowledge the photographers who took these photos as I didn't write down where I got them from.  But if you see one of your photos here, thanks for posting it on facebook).  One thing I have also observed from being on facebook is that just like me, most runners have the desire to run better on the trails, and are keen to learn as much as they can about the best way to prepare for trail races, especially the ultra events.  I, myself, am still on an upward learning curve, however, with many, many years of endurance running experience, I feel that I have a lot that I can offer.  I therefore think that now is the ideal time, to share my knowledge within an alternative mode, in addition to my UltraStu blog.  I have been informally coaching two athletes for the last year or so, but I would like to publicly announce here that I am now available to take on athletes for on-line coaching.  So if you think that you could endure, lengthy e-mails, or Skype/telephone calls, then click the On-Line Coaching with Stuart Mills tab at the top of this blog page to find out more. 

My motive with the On-Line Coaching with Stuart Mills is to share my knowledge and to experience the joy of being involved in assisting runners to improve their trail running performances.  However, as the On-Line Coaching will involve substantial input from both the athlete and myself, there will be a monthly fee.  My motive for establishing the coaching isn't about making money, so you should find that my coaching fee is more than likely to be less than other On-Line Coaching providers.  However, I would anticipate that my lower price won't correspond with a lower quality coaching service. 

If you are interested, please have a look at the On-Line Coaching page and give me a call or zap me an e-mail, to find out more.  As you can imagine, due to my rather excessive ultra everything manner, I will not be able to accommodate many athletes.  At the moment I am thinking of most likely a maximum of ten runners, so hopefully there aren't twenty or thirty runners out there wanting to experience personalised coaching advice from yours truly, UltraStu, as I would hate to create disappointment within the fantastic ultra trail running community of which I am so fortunate to be involved with.

Lastly, to those of you who were at the Lakeland 100 / 50 prize giving on the Sunday, you may recall that I said a few words after receiving my trophy.  My family weren't present at the prize giving to see me collect  the trophy or hear what I said, so I was just wondering if anyone out there has any video footage of any part of the prize giving.  As mentioned within my few words on stage, the atmosphere, the positive energy within the school hall during the prize giving was absolutely amazing.  It would be great to have a video record of the occasion.

My sign off quote will be short:  "Thank you to everyone that was involved in putting on the Montane Lakeland 100 and 50 races. Also a huge thanks to everyone who gave me tremendous support, leading up to and during the event.  It was very much appreciated."  Stuart Mills 2013 

Thanks,

Stuart

PS  Earlier this morning I was interviewed by Ian Corless from the Talk Ultra podcast show.  So if you haven't had enough of UltraStu by now, you can listen to a bit about my background, a bit about my training ideas, and a bit about racing the Lakeland 100, this coming Friday, the 9th of August, when the show is released.  As one would expect, the interview ended up being a bit of an ultra in length.  Well the podcast is called Talk Ultra!

Friday, 2 August 2013

Montane Lakeland 100 - Initial 'Brief' Race Rpeort

Hi,

My initial 'brief' race report from last weekends Montane Lakeland 100 race has been published on the Montane website.  I state initial race report as I am still mid way through writing my full race report that will be published here, on UltraStu, hopefully this weekend.  The initial report on the Montane website focusses on my experiences whilst running the actual event, and the battles encountered along my journey. Whereas the focus of my full report will be on the TOTAL preparation I carried out leading up to the Montane Lakeland 100.  How the massive changes I made to many aspects of my training worked, or in some cases didn't work, and required further modifications.

 
Shortly After the Start Running Through Coniston - The Battles Commence - Firstly with Ken Sutor


Anyway, while you wait for my full report, hopefully you will find my initial report interesting and with some useful messages.  Although I have titled the initial report as brief, it's not actually that brief!

Here is the link to the report:  http://www.montane.co.uk/news/stuart-mills-montane-lakeland-100-experience

Happy reading,

Stuart

Thursday, 16 August 2012

Montane Lakeland 100 - Learning From and Planning for the Future

Hi

I started writing up this race report nearly two weeks ago, but now having returned from holiday, hopefully I will finish it tonight.  One thing that comes out in all of the Lakeland 100 reports I have read over the last two weeks is that the event has such an impact on all that take part. Every report highlights what the Lakeland 100 means to them, and the enjoyment and feeling of satisfaction in taking on such a tough challenge.  My report that follows will no doubt also convey this message, however, where my report may differ is on the increased emphasis on my performance during the race.  To me, the Lakeland 100 is a race, and hence my number one focus for the event is to perform.  This doesn't meant that I don't enjoy the awesome scenary or appreciate the tremendously supportive ultra running community, but being a race, performance on race day takes precedence.  So lets get this race report completed!

In my pre-race blog post I commented how my main aim from this years race was to simply run well.  Although I had won the race back in 2010 in a time of 24 hours 10 minutes, I felt that I had slowed significantly over the second half of the course, and therefore I wanted to run strongly right through the entire 105 miles this year.  Back in 2010 following my three day recce run I felt that the Lakeland 100 was runable in under 20 hours.  I was over 4 hours away from sub20 in 2010, and leading up to this years race, I felt if all went well on race day then I could possibly manage a time of 20:30.  Why not sub 20 hours?  Well, although not making any excuses, as much as I tried to convince myself that not running for eight weeks wasn't a problem, deep down within my sub-conscious, I knew that it would have at least a minor detrimental effect, so hence the slower ideal time.

Leading up to the race, probably as a result of missing eight weeks training earlier in the year, both my physical and non-physical training was at possibly for me, a record high level.  I spent many hours researching the event, each leg, the distances, my split times from 2010 race and recce runs, and extensively used John Kynaston's videos to aid me in refreshing my memory of the route.  As part of the non-physical training a detailed leg by leg race schedule was constructed that resulted in a finish time of 20:30.  These times are calculated weeks in advance so they can enter the sub-conscious, but come race week, I do not look at them, so on race day I only have a vague recollection of a few of the leg times.

Physical training wise, again probably in order to boost my confidence, my weekly mileage for me was pretty high, with an average of 49.1 miles per week.  This included one race, the Endurancelife Classic Quarter 44 mile race, which was five weeks previous and went pretty well.  Perhaps I over did the physical training a wee bit following this race, as during the last week of tapering, I usually totally freshen up, and feel great.  However, leading into the Lakeland 100 an over-trained feeling existed.  So much that after feeling so tired on my last planned run of five miles on the Wednesday, one extra four mile run was needed on the Thursday as confidence was rather low, which for me was rather foreign!

I arrived at Coniston on the Friday mid-afternoon with the plan to soak up as much positive energy as I could, but I was also very conscience not to get too excited and try to chat to everyone prior to race start.  One key aspect of a 100 mile event is to get ones' pacing right and not waste any energy.  So I spent a mixture of the few hours chatting, but also a lot of time on my own, just clarifying exactly what the aim of the day was to be.  In response to a question whilst chatting about my planned pacing strategy, I responded stating that I would be going out fast as usual with the intention to get to checkpoint one in first place, whatever pace it would take!  Verbalising this plan, which was one of my many visualisations that I had carried out as part of my non-physical training, actually 'woke me up'!  What was I saying, had my 'ego' taken over?  Why the need to be first?  So the last 40 minutes before race start was really important as it appeared that my 'ego' was taking over.  So I went back to the starting point within my planning for all races, what do I want, why do I want it, how much do I want it?  And reinforced the goal, i.e. to run well, hence no need to focus on what others do. 

So how fast do I start?  As you are probably aware, I have this race philosophy of "Run as fast as you can, while you can."  I am totally convinced in the successfulness of this approach.  Of course "as fast as you can" is relative to the race duration, it doesn't literally mean, "as fast as you can", i.e.10km pace or quicker!  The reason for the philosophy is that no matter what pace you run at, after 10+ hours you will be tired, so you will slow.  Better then to have covered more miles at the 10 hour mark, hence run fast at the start.  The real key ingredient to consider in determining your pace is how much Race Focus Energy (RFE) is being consumed.  I have covered the concept of RFE in the post titled Delamere Spartans Weekend – A Bit More on the Race Focus Energy Fatigue Model , but to quickly summarise, RFE has a strong effect on your running pace, and it is when your tank of RFE is near empty that you significantly slow down.  So reflecting back to the race start of 2010, my strong memory was that the RFE demand for the first leg was high, too high.  So having sorted out my 'ego trip' of needing to get to Seathwaite (CP1) first, I was then comfortable in the plan to start off at a lower intensity, and to use the unused RFE from leg 1 for later in the race.  During the first few legs, time gaps between runners are small, and to run just a few minutes quicker requires high levels of RFE, whereas later in the race, the time gaps are huge, and it is quite easy to run 10 - 15 minutes quicker or slower on a single leg, with little difference in RFE usage.

One could possibly conclude then, that the best strategy would be to start even slower during the first few legs, and this is a very common approach within ultra trail races.  To me, I love the 'buzz' of the competition.  The excitement from racing, the positive energy from being near the front of the field.  One important aspect of the RFE model is that you can top up ones RFE tank during the race.  So starting out fast allows me to do this.  One thing that makes a race different to me is that it is a race.  Yes the enjoyment from the awesome scenery and terrain are still present, and the enjoyment from the accomplishment of an internal personal challenge, but in addition, there is the challenge of competing against fellow runners, of racing with them, feeling their responses, testing each other out over the different aspects of the course.  Yes, although running well is my overall aim, this running well also involves an aspect of racing well.  I think the racing aspect significantly improves my overall run performance.

So I stand on the start line near the front of 263 runners ready for a quickish start but not as quick as 2010.  I recognise many familiar faces and there is a strong positive community feeling as 'good luck' and 'best wishes' are exchanged between the runners.  It is a warm sunny evening, and it looks like the weather will stay warm and reasonably dry throughout the night and into Saturday afternoon.  Having pleasant running conditions does increase my enjoyment level for races, adds to my RFE tank, and so I am in a happy positive mood as the race start nears, but with an underlying feeling of wanting to actually get started.  Wanting to settle into the race, to allow any doubts regarding preparation to vanish, and to simply enjoy running 105 miles as quickly as I can.  To really challenge myself, and hopefully respond successfully to the challenges I will encounter before I return to Coniston on Saturday afternoon.

Leg1 Coniston to Seathwaite
Race Start at Coniston

As we leave the school and run through Coniston I am running alongside one or two other runners.  Running quickish, but as decided prior to race start, at a lower intensity than 2010.  One thing you will note as I reflect on my 2012 race is that there are frequent comparisons back to how I performed in 2010.  Probably the main reason for this is that during my preparation for 2012 I frequently thought back to the 2010 race in  order to identify those aspects that went well, but more importantly to recognise aspects that I could improve on, in order to develop strategies to prevent the massive decline in running pace during the later sections of the race, which occurred in 2010.

Working Hard Just Before Miners Bridge

We start the first climb up the gravel road before crossing Miners Bridge and onto some single track.  Immediately as the gradient increases, even before we reach the gravel road I decide that the effort is too high in order to stay alongside the lead runner, whom  I don't recognise.  In making this decision regarding the effort being too high, what I am referring to is that the Race Focus Energy (RFE) demand was too high.  Physiologically I was working reasonably hard, however, nothing too strenuous, probably at a lower intensity than what I would race a trail marathon at.  Looking at my Garmin heart rate data following the race, which can be view on the Garmin Connect website, an average heart rate of 167 bpm for the first two miles confirms that physiologically I am running at a physiological intensity slightly less than for a marathon duration race.  It is important to understand though that the physiological input is only one input that contributes to the RFE demand.  RFE is also influenced by other aspects such as the duration of the race, your expectations of how you will perform, your goals/aims you have set for the race, the level of doubt/uncertainty, the degree of being within the present moment, experiencing the here and now, the positivity you possess, the accepting of the surrounding positive energy and the ignoring of any negativity from mainly within. 

So I guess largely as a result of some underlying doubt over my preparation especially in possibly over doing it a bit during the last few weeks and the feeling of tiredness, combined with my frequent revisiting of my 2010 race experiences that reminded me of the massive slowing down during the last six legs, the RFE demand to maintain the required pace to run alongside the leader was higher than usual, hence the decision to let the lead runner go.  Having also spent time immediately prior to the race start reminding myelf to ignore my ego and focus on what I was doing and not on the other runners, this aided the decision, as not leading the race was no longer associated with any negativity, in essence I was happy not to be leading. Just a brief aside, during all of my races I wear a Garmin GPS watch, and this year used a Forerunner 310 XT which had a longer battery life, nearly 20 hours.  However, I now never look at the data whilst racing, as I try to rely on feel during the race rather than heart rate or mile pace data to confirm whether I am running well.  The Garmin GPS/HR data is collected for later analysis after the race.

So the lead runner, who from the results I discover is Ken Sutor, quickly leaves me behind, and reaches CP1 totally out of sight in a time of 62:17, which compared to my very quick 2010 time of 63:10 clearly illustrates just how fast he was running.  (Note: Ken continues to run very quickly for the second leg, again recording the fastest leg time, before slowing down on leg 3 (only recording the 15th quickest leg 3 time) and eventually finishes in 11th place overall.)  As Ken leaves me behind on the first climb, I am comfortable with not leading and also have no problems as a second runner, Ed Batty quickly passes me.

Near the Top of Walnar Scar Road
Running up the steady climb along Walnar Scar Road, Ken rapidly continues to move away, however, I am able to keep in reasonable contact with Ed.  Just prior to the summit Duncan Harris catches up with me and we descend together down the very rocky track towards CP1.  Duncan has a pretty strong ultra trail running CV including a win in the 2010 Fellsman along with many other wins, and a third place finish in the 2010 Lakeland 100.  As I run near Duncan one thing that I am very conscious of is for my pace not to be determined by the other runners around me.  Often it is too easy to ease of the pace simply due to the surrounding runners slowing down.  I therefore concentrate on maintaining my pace and slowly leave Duncan behind on the technically demanding rocky descent.  Looking at my Garmin GPS data which automatically stores data for each mile split of the race, my one mile rocky descending split time is 6:51.  Although pretty quick, especially if you are aware of the terrain, not quite as quick as my 6:48 mile split from 2010.  Just prior to entering the checkpoint at Seathwaite I pass Ed as he heads out on leg 2, with the results showing that I am 57 seconds behind.  My 2012 leg time is 66:25, 3:15 slower that my 2010.  I am pleased with my approach of starting slower, and overall happy with both my position in the race and how I am feeling.

Leg 2 Seathwaite to Boot
After a quick dib, and some water to wash down a gel, I am on my way.  As I exit the checkpoint, other runners have already arrived, and more runners are rapidly approaching on the brief 80 metre out and back section along the road, before the route heads off-road onto a potentially boggy leg.

As I start the second leg, I recall a feeling of relief, that all is going fine.  I have got over the dilemma of how fast to start.  I have no 'side effects' of the tiredness that had been ever present in my training during the last few weeks, and I am simply enjoying the present moment, of running fast along the fantastic route of the Lakeland 100.  Leg 2 starts with a steepish climb, then some undulating track before a demanding boggy section.  Both Ken and Ed are out of sight, and I am rejoined by Duncan.  Again, although running reasonable near each other we are both running our own pace and he slowly pulls away through the bog.  As I start the steep descent down to a farm, I am 'left for dead' by a runner who goes flying past firstly me, and then Duncan.  Now, although I don't run frequently over rough terrain, come race day I can typically 'hold my own', but not with this runner.  I later discover that the rapid descender is Ian Symington, who has run quite a few fell races! 

As we run around the farm as the track flattens out I gain a small lead on Ian and Duncan.  There is then some confusion over the correct route to take as we reach the bridge.  I am confident that we cross the bridge, with this part of the course being changed from the 2010 route, however, Duncan decides to stick to the old 2010 route and not cross the bridge.  Ian follows Duncan and so I am back to running on my own, as I pass the photographer prior to the checkpoint at Boot.

All Smiles Enjoying the Sunshine Near Boot

During the last week I have not looked at my 2010 race split times or my 20:30 race schedule, so of the fifteen leg times I am probably only able to recall the first two leg times/  As I approach Boot I am therefore aware that I am slightly down on both by 2010 time and 20:30 schedule, although totally comfortable with this, confident in that I will regain back this time and hopefully more later in the race due to the reduced demand on my RFE.

Leg3 Boot to Wasdale Head
After another quick dib and water to wash down my second gel I am quickly on my way.  Duncan arrives at the checkpoint just as I depart, so he hasn't lost that much time by following the old 2010 route.  Probably around 2 miles later he rejoins me as we make our way towards Burnmoor Tarn and it takes the pressure off having to navigate to the wooden bridge next to the lake as I simply follow Duncan as he heads in what feels the correct direction. 

It is as I crest the small climb before dropping down towards Wasdale Head I am joined by Terry Conway, Paul Tiernay and Barry Murray who are running together.  I know all three runners reasonably well, having raced them all before and chatted to them at other events.  I am therefore not surprised that they have finally caught up to me, as I have a feeling that they are still on their steep upward curve in terms of learning about ultra trail running, and therefore expect them to improve on their 2011 Lakeland 100 performances.  I am also still learning about how to perform during ultra trail races, so also on the upwards curve, however, I do recall thinking at the moment in time when the three of them caught me that maybe the steepness of their learning curve was steeper than mine, and maybe then there was the possibility that I wouldn't finish ahead of them today, in contrast to finishing ahead of them when I raced them all during 2011. Seeing the ease at which they were running also didn't aid my confidence, as although I wasn't working that hard, I acknowledge to myself that I was demanding more RFE than they appeared to using.

We have a brief chat as I join the three of them, and we all take note of the absolutely superb surroundings, with the amazingly colours created by the setting sun.  It is enjoyable running within the group and I conclude that running with them for a few hours would be a good strategy.  I could then simply let them set the pace and navigate the route, and hence I could just relax and enjoy the running  One thing that I have noticed this years compared to 2010 is just how much easier with regards to RFE, e.g. mentally in terms of running, when not in the lead.  Back in 2010, I had a clear strategy to lead from the start, gain an 'out of sight' lead, and hold onto it.  So for the first few legs back in 2010 there was always the feeling of needing to go harder, to get further ahead, to ensure that I was not seen, get caught.  In terms of RFE it was definitely more demanding.  The big plus side of leading though was the massive replenishment of RFE whilst running and at each checkpoint, as it was confirmed that I was in the lead in 2010.  As we ran as a group towards checkpoint 3 I recall evaluating the two different scenarios and coming to the conclusion that 2012 was less 'mentally demanding'.  Whether more enjoyable or satisfying I was unable to conclude as the bonus of there being the feeling of reduced pressure was offset with the reduced 'buzz' from not leading.  We entered checkpoint 3 together, fifteen seconds down on Duncan, but with the first two runners Ken and Ed nowhere in sight.

Leg4 Wasdale Head to Buttermere
Terry, Paul and Barry leave the check point a few seconds ahead of me and I notice that I have to work quite hard to pull back the 40 metre deficit.  It isn't long before we commence the long climb up to Black Sail Pass.  As much as the prospect of running within their group was appealing, the intensity required to stay with them just felt that little bit too high.  I therefore had to accept the decision that letting them slowly leave me behind was the best strategy. 

Looking back at this point in the race, it still amazes me the way in which the body and mind work together.  We were at around mile 21 of a 105 mile race, so at exactly one fifth distance.  Yet somehow the body and mind together are able to 'tell me' that the pace I was having to adopt to stay within the group was too fast!  What is this message based on?  Looking at my heart rate data, the average heart rate for the mile prior to deciding to drop back from the group was 161 bpm.  This was quite a bit higher than average heart rates of 154 and 146 during the 2 miles prior to the checkpoint (although these two miles did contain lengthy downhill sections).  How high is 161 bpm for a one mile average heart rate?  Well not as high as mile 4, up Walnar Scar road where the heart rate average was 167, but higher than most of the miles during legs 2 and 3 where it hovered around the mid 150s.  So looking at the heart rate data, it would appear that the feeling of intensity, in terms of whether the pace is too quick or slow is based on ones heart rate in direct relation to the heart rate immediately preceding.  But as I have mentioned earlier, it isn't only physiological data, but also includes all of those other aspects that contribute to the RFE usage rate.  Simply the decision to try to 'hang onto' the group of three results in a negative response, and hence increases the RFE demand.  Even though I had beaten all three runners the last time we had raced back in 2011, whether it was the fact that they were running as a close knit threesome I don't know, but for some reason I definitely felt 'inferior' to them at that moment in time.

Back to the issue of the preceding intensity affecting the RFE demand, just how much preceding is unclear, i.e. whether just the one mile prior or maybe the prior hour?  Also, how do checkpoints add to the situation, where the heart rate / RFE demand drops, if only for one minute?  Is it easier or harder immediately following a checkpoint?  One thing I really noticed this year, was that for me, it was always harder to get going again following a checkpoint.  It was as if during the few minutes of rest at the checkpoint, the body and mind re calibrated what intensity it felt was acceptable for the remainder of the race, resulting in 'wanting' to go easier!

So as I continue the long climb, I have to watch the three of them head off into the distance.  Then to 'knock me' even further, Duncan who we had passed at checkpoint 3, then moves pass me reasonably quickly.  I have typed "knock me even further", but reflecting back to this moment, although it was disappointing not to be able to stay with the other runners, I didn't let it get me down.  One thing that I learnt from my experience at Ultra Trail Mont Blanc (UTMB) in 2011 was the importance of enjoyment, the importance of remaining positive.  I kept these lessons to the forefront of my thoughts, and re-visited my main focus for the Lakeland 100, 2012, i.e. to run well.  I assessed how I was running, and concluded that I was running well.  Okay I wasn't able to stay with the other leading runners, but I reminded myself, the importance of focusing on what I am doing, not what others are doing!  So I continued along leg 4 happy and content with where I was at, enjoying the evening as it was progressively getting darker.  With there firstly being the steep descent from Black Sail Pass to cover and then potentially being a tricky navigation issue following Scarth Gap, my attention switched to racing the fading light and to complete these sections before it became to dark.

Probably around half way down the first descent, down towards the youth hostel, the 'demon descender' Ian Symington again overtook me as if I was descending like a granny.  He was indeed very quick, extremely skillful!  It wasn't long before he was out of sight and before I knew it my head torch and hand torch were out and I was running along the smooth path through the woods alongside the lake immediately prior to the village of Buttemere.  As I approach checkpoint 4 at Buttermere Village Hall I just make out a runner or two leaving.  So although I have lost some time on the other runners, I am reassured that it isn't much and I am not out of this race yet!  Overall I am pleased with how I am running, but there is some disappointment that I am not closer to the front.  At checkpoint 4 I presume that I am in eighth place: behind the two quick runners from leg 1 Ken and Ed: the group of three Terry, Paul, Barry; Duncan, and demon descender Ian.  However, the results indicate that I was actually in seventh place, having got past speedster Ken during leg 4. I didn't physically overtake Ken, so perhaps he went a bit astray somewhere during leg 4.

Leg 5 Buttermere to Braithwaite
I leave the checkpoint before any other runners arrive, which is reassuring as it allows me to focus on those in front, rather than being worried about being caught from behind. As much as I know that I should focus on what I am doing, I do find that I tend to compare myself in relation to the other runners.  I guess this is where my competitive nature comes in.  I can go for an enjoyable run across awesome trails any day of the week, and I frequently do within the South Downs National Park.  But it is only during racing that I really test myself, challenge myself to run as fast and as hard as I can, in a competition against others.  So hence the competitive element is always there.  Maybe I am slightly different here when it comes to ultra trail running, as within the various reports I have read, I haven't seen any signs of this competitive element!  This is most emphasised within Terry's excellent and intriguing report on his Lakeland 100 journey.  Barry's interesting and excellent report also contains a strong non-competitive theme.  I guess one of the key messages with regards to this aspect is just how great ultra trail running is.  That the activity of ultra trail running is so inclusive, that it can accommodate all that wish to partake no matter what their motives, and all of us gain and feel richer from the experience, having taken on such a demanding challenge.

Leg 5 consist of another lengthy steep climb over Sail Pass before some quick running as the route gently descends down to Braithwaite.  Getting up to Sail Pass requires being totally aware of ones surroundings as there are one or two left turns required to stay on route.  This need to be 'within the now' really assists me to stay positive and focused.  I can see the three torches of Terry, Paul and Barry together ahead, as well as a few single torches, they aren't too far up the climb, but being uphill are probably around five minutes ahead. 

The long climb and the initial descent to the last potential missed junction turnoff at Barrow Door goes well and I am well pleased with myself for successfully navigating the most difficult leg of the entire race.  I then get a massive boost of 'energy', I can see three torches probably around only 400 metres of downhill running ahead of me.  Instantly, I feel really positive about my performance and my pace automatically quickens.  The next mile is a gentle downhill to checkpoint 5 and I am flying in the dark.  The Garmin GPS data later shows that I covered the one mile descent in 6 mins 37 secs!  Pretty quick considering I had been running for over 6 hours!

I quickly catch up to the group of three, but no 'hanging onto' the group now.  I am on a mission.  I recall thinking that "I will show these youngsters that they haven't got the better of me yet", although the word "yet" was quite key, as much as as I didn't want to accept it, I felt that once the three of them had got over their negativity at going off course, which I concluded must have happened, and which did actually happen, then probably based on how smooth and rhythmical they were running earlier, no doubt I would see them again!  However, I wasn't going to waste the opportunity  and therefore I try to add to their negativity by blasting past them!  I arrive at the checkpoint around 15 seconds ahead of them, and after a quick dib and wash down of another gel I am quickly on my way, with a friendly 'see ya later' ensuring that Terry, Paul and Barry can sense my burst in positivity.

Leg 6 Braithwaite to Blencathra
The first two miles is flat consisting of road running and then along a disused railway before the steady climb along the Cumbria Way.  In an effort to put some distance on the trio before their assumed negativity at going off course subsides, I run these two miles as quite a high intensity, therefore demanding a high level of RFE.  I get to the steady climb and realise that perhaps I have overdone it a bit and therefore ease of the intensity up the hill.  It therefore doesn't take long for Terry, Paul and Barry to catch and then overtake me.  This time I do not even attempt to 'hang onto' their group.  Not only am I needing to reduce the RFE demand, but I notice that for the first time during the race my legs are beginning to tire!  This is rather concerning as I am only at the 35 mile mark, only one third of the journey.  The quads are beginning to feel damaged and the hamstrings are beginning to show signs of tightening.  These symptoms are expected during an ultra, but typically not until around the 70 mile mark of a 100 mile race, definitely never this early on!

I then think back to UTMB, and the importance of not to get into a negative downward spiral.  I acknowledge the initiation of discomfort from my legs, but then pay it no further attention.  I then focus on the positives, the present moment of running in the peacefulness of the quiet warm night, with a million stars above, enjoying what I enjoy doing, simply running.  For the next few miles, I am no longer in a race, I am simply enjoying running on my own.  I skirt my way gently uphill around the side of Whit Beck towards the un-manned dibber point as the route starts the descent down to checkpoint 6 at Blencathra.  At the junction I am surprised to stumble across another runner, it is Ian who flew past me earlier on the descents.  He is unable to find the dibber point.  I hadn't read this specific section of the road book that carefully so I wasn't totally aware of where the dibber point should be.  My plan was to simply look out for a light indicating its location.  I look down the track around 100 metres and see a light, and we here down to the dibber point together.  Having for the previous 20 minutes enjoyed running on my own, after dibbing I briefly stop and walk for a few moments to allow Ian to run ahead.  Reflecting back on this now, it really surprises me that I did this, totally against my competitive instinct.  But at that moment in time, where I had been focusing on the enjoyment of running, I didn't want the peacefulness of running on my own to be disrupted.  I continue running gently downhill to the next checkpoint, aware of Ian around 100 metres ahead, but not trying to gain or stay with him.

Leg 7 Blencathra to Dockray
Ian leaves the checkpoint around 15 - 30 seconds ahead of me, so for the next three miles or so, down to and then along a disused railway line, he remains 100 - 150 metres ahead of me.  I am happy with the situation, happy to be running on my own, just happy to be enjoying the present moment.  We leave the railway line and start the steepish and boggy climb up to the Coach Road.  Due to the steepness of the climb the distance between us is reduced, and this aids me as I can simply follow the route he takes rather than needing to look out for the corner of the wood, the gate in the fence, or the indistinct path alongside the fence line.  Taking advantage of not needing to navigate I am enjoying the night sky and notice not just one shooting star but two shooting stars directly above within a few minutes of each other.  Yes, this ultra trail running is quite an experience!

The climb continues a little further once we reach the Coach Road and I notice that Ian continues to walk even though the hill has nearly flattened out.  As quickly as I left competition mode on the climb on leg 6, I am back into race mode!  I focus on closing the gap and then to go straight past him.  The positivity increases again, this time from knowing that I am running well.  Especially as back in 2010 during the same stretch of the race I experienced my first 'difficult patch' and struggled along the Coach Road then for a few miles.  Tonight, the total opposite.  I am feeling good, running smoothly, as the tiredness from the legs has disappeared as my attention is taken elsewhere, with the focus on positivity and enjoyment.  I run straight past Ian and then notice a single torch ahead so continue to run at a reasonably high RFE level in an effort to bring the torch light closer.  Before I know it, I have reached the checkpoint at Dockray.  Whilst running quickly along the Coach Road I compare tonight's leg 7 to 2010 and am really pleased that I haven't experienced the difficult 'patch' like two years previous.  As I enter the checkpoint Duncan who I last saw on the climb out form checkpoint 4 is there.  He doesn't look happy.  He comments to me that he doubts that he will make it to the finish this year.  Just at that moment Ian arrives at the checkpoint, so instead of offering Duncan some encouragement, selfishly I ignore him and focus on getting out of the checkpoint as quickly as possible.  Apologies Duncan if you are reading this.  Sorry that I wasn't able to offer you the support you needed at that moment in time.  I am still on the upward learning curve in terms of ultra trail running!  Duncan did struggle during the next leg and unfortunately withdrew at the Dalemain checkpoint.

Leg 8 Dockray to Dalemain
I leave the checkpoint on my own and commence running along the one mile downhill road section to the village of Dockray.  Whether it was the brief stop at the checkpoint, or the fact that I was now running on the road, or the increase in the downhill gradient.  Most likely all three, but instantly my legs were rather uncomfortable!  Rather than being able to increase the pace on this smooth downhill section, due to the discomfort from the legs I am having to run slowly!  The Garmin GPS data shows that it takes me 9 mins 25 secs to complete a one mile downhill along roads where the elevation loss was 103 metres.  Quite different to the 6:37 mile I ran less than three and a half hours earlier. 

There is a dramatic switch from the positivity of overtaking Duncan and Ian to the negativity due to my 'trashed' legs, at the 51 mile mark, still not even half way!  Although I am putting in the same amount of 'effort' in terms of RFE (Race Focus Energy).  As mentioned earlier, the RFE demand is influenced by much more than just the physiological demand.  Having to deal with the discomfort from my legs, combined with the massive increase in negativity, significantly increases the demand on RFE.  I have no option but have to reduce the physiological demand in order to reduce the RFE demand.  The Garmin GPS HR data shows that for the two miles prior to check point 7 my average heart rate was 141 bpm, compared to an average HR of 124 bpm for the two miles immediately following the checkpoint.  It doesn't take long for Ian to go flying past me, which further adds to my negative state of mind.

I recognise what is happening, again learning from UTMB 2011, and work hard to get back to a positive state.  I am now running along probably the most scenic part of the entire 105 mile course.  The single track section that contours around Gowbarrow overlooking the lake below.  Not that I can see the lake or the awesome scenery as it is still pitch black, however, I do recall this picturesque section whist on my recce run back in 2010.  I gain a further increase in positivity when I compare the level of darkness at this moment of time with the 2010 race.  Not memorising any checkpoint times from 2010 or my 20:30 schedule I do not have any 'concrete' feedback on how fast I am running.  But I don't need any split times to tell me that up to the end of leg 7 I have been running well, quicker than 2010.  This is confirmed with the fact that back it 2010 it was just beginning to get light at this point of the race.  Tonight, still plenty dark.  I therefore take added pleasure in it being dark, as the longer it is dark, the quicker I have been running.

So as I regain a positive state, my physiological intensity is able to increase, but with there still being discomfort form my legs, even now on the uphills as well, which increases the rate of RFE usage, the average heart rate only increases back up to 135 bpm rather than around 141 for the majority of leg 7.  I exit the woods of Swinburn's Park and cross the road into some rather boggy fields.  As I struggle to locate the direction of the footpath as it is still very dark, combined with the difficulty of running across the boggy fields, I experience my first real 'difficult patch' of the race so far.  I am mentally tired, I am struggling to access the required Race Focus Energy to keep running.  It is pretty similar to what I experienced back in 2010 but that time it was during leg 7.  I get out my 'security blanket' chocolate covered coffee beans and consume some of these, combined with some Cliff Gel Shots!  I have little option but to walk this section, as I need to re-focus and get my mind back into action.  I go slightly off course, but not too bad considering it was still dark.  Just to note for the entire 105 mile route, this section here was the only time that I strayed from the course, and that was with the road book and map staying in my back pack the entire way.  Yes, my non-physical preparation had been very thorough!

Slightly Off Course During Leg 8

Earlier within this report I mentioned how ones race intensity, level of race effort appears to be influenced by the preceding level.  Well following my walking section across the boggy fields midway on leg 8 where my average heart rate for the mile reduced to only 115 bpm, from that moment in the race, I was never able to increase the race effort, i.e. get my Race Focus Energy demand up to the levels prior to that section.  For the next 34 miles until the Garmin GPS watch battery runs out, my average heart rate for a mile never rose above 128 bpm, with the average being only 117bpm.  Considering that prior to leg 8 my average heart rate was 151bpm.  Yes, leg 8 was a key turning point of the race.

Once I get back off the wet fields and onto the lengthy road section, I am back into running, and really focus on enjoyment and remaining positive.  I try to make the most of the gentle downhill sections and do manage to 'bang out' a 9:17 mile, which does feel quite quick in comparison to my previous walking section.  Unfortunately that mile, mile number 59 was pretty well my last decent mile of the race!  I arrive at the Dalemain checkpoint and have my longest stop to date of five minutes, compared to all of my previous checkpoint stops of only around one minute.  Whether the longer stop helped or not,  I am unsure, but probably hindered my progress.  Maybe I should have taken even longer, to have a real break, but with my legs rather delicate I didn't want to risk them seizing up.

Leg 9 Dalemain to Howtown
I leave the checkpoint walking, and it takes me a minute or two to get moving.  Again the focus is on trying to stay within the present moment and enjoy the experience.  I get running again and try to regain some rhythm.  I make reasonable progress though Pooley Bridge and up the gentle climb onto the open fell.  Although trying to focus on the present moment, I can't help but reflect back two years to the same point in the 2010 race.  Back then I had had two difficult and hence slow legs on legs 7 and 8, but then had got my 'act together' and ran really well on leg 9.  As much as I recognised the importance of remaining positive, I was finding it difficult to do so, knowing that I wasn't running as quick on this leg as 2010.

My focus then turns to a comparison between my overall performance to date for today's Lakeland 100 in relation to the 2010 race.  Although I didn't have any precise split data, I knew that I was significantly quicker than 2010, and bearing in mind that I slower massively in 2010 on legs 10 - 15, unless a disaster happened I was guaranteed to finish in a quicker time.  Yes, although my legs were giving me strong messages of discomfort, I was pretty well able to deal with these messages, with the only consequence being that it was increasing the rate of RFE usage dealing with them, hence the resulting rather slow pace, as the physiological demand had to be subsequently reduced.  There was never any question of DNFing, which was a real bonus, and a real positive as I slowly made my way to checkpoint 9, and then slowly start on my way to checkpoint 10 at Mardale Head.

Leg 10 Howtown to Mardale Head
I slowly eventually reach Madale Head, although in comparison with my leg 10 split time for 2010 I am over ten minutes quicker this year.  This isn't a reflection of my pace this year, but more an indication of my really difficult patch on leg 10 back in 2010.

Being able to run so slowly over leg 10 but yet know that I was still quicker than my 2010 time didn't really help, and in reality probably hindered my performance this year.  During my preparation I had spent much time formulating my race goals, my aims/focus for the race.  And after much deliberation came to the simple conclusion that my overall race focus was to "run well".  The problem is I didn't go into more detail in terms on what running well meant.  When I formulated this aim, I clearly knew what I meant by run well, things such as actually running, not walking unless it is a steady climb.  Running relaxed, within a rhythm, remaining positive, enjoying the experience, being within the present moment, etc.  Unfortunately, I find as I get tired during an ultra trail race, my body and mind tend to work together in a combined effort to deceive me and to get me to slow down.  So my clear perception of what running well means, is distorted and changed to mean to simply to run a personal best finishing time.  Yes, surely, if you finish with a personal best time for the course then you must have run well.  Logical really!  Well that was the message that I was being 'told' and in my fatigued state I didn't have any come back to respond to the convincing argument!  So as it takes me over two and a half hours to complete leg 10, by the time I reach the checkpoint at Mardale Head, the sole aim of the 2012 Lakeland 100 is to simply run quicker than my 2010 finishing time!

Leg 11 Mardale Head to Kentmere
Arriving at checkpoint 10 at Mardale Head was a real bonus.  The checkpoint was manned by runners from the Delamare Spartans running club.  Last year I was fortunate to be invited by the club to do a presentation on ultra trail running.  It was a great weekend, and I really enjoyed the positive energy of the enthusiastic and friendly members of the recently formed running club.  Well checkpoint 10 was no different.  I could hear the cow bells ringing loudly as I got close, and the support from the runners was superb, as it was at all of the checkpoints, but the bonus with this checkpoint was that many of the crew were familiar faces who all knew me and gave me tremendous personal support.

I leave the checkpoint on a real high and get to the top of the lengthy and steep climb to Gatesgarth Pass with no problems at all from the legs.  Amazing, really, it just confirms that the degree of difficulty I was experiencing due to the discomfort messages from the legs is really dependent upon ones state of mind and how one wishes to focus on , to interpret the messages.  Yes, this aspect is one of the crucial components of performing well in ultra trail running and definitely needs my full attention in order to avoid what happened  to me for pretty well the remaining five legs!

I get over the top and start thinking after such a strong climb that I can really smash by finishing time from 2010.  Then there is the start of the downhill, and the positivity form the Delamare Spartans is now too distant.  I simply pay too much attention to the discomfort messages from my legs, combined with my newly agreed race aim of simply beating my 2010 finish time, I just have no argument, and believe it or not, I still find it hard to accept it now, but I start walking on a downhill!  To put it in simple terms, there was no need for me to run.  I was going to run quicker than my 2010 finish time even if I walked this downhill so why the need to run!  It takes me 17 mins 24 secs to cover a one mile downhill section that had an elevation drop of 163 metres.  This was after I briefly battled with the discomfort of descending, so it wasn't an instant giving up, by taking 14 mins 52 secs to cover the previous one mile steeper section with a 205 metre elevation drop!  Two downhill miles taking over 32 minutes!!!

Yes, performance in ultra trail running is so much more than the physical, hence why I spend significant time on non-physical training.  The formulation of race goals, as my experience here illustrates, is crucial in order to have some 'come back' to the arguments one is likely to face during the later stages of an ultra trail race, which strongly want you to go slower.  My race goals were just too vague!  Yes, they don't need to be massively detailed in terms of specific split times, or heart rates, or race position etc.  However, they do need to be detailed in terms of what they mean in actual application come the race.  What does the term running well translate to during the race?  How can you evaluate this, and determine whether you are doing what is required to achieve this?  One of the key things I have learnt from my journey along the 2012 Lakeland 100 route is this importance of race aims/goals.

Opps, I haven't finished the race.  I still have five legs to complete!  Well not really much to report during these last five legs.  After walking on the downhill during leg 11, as you can imagine I wasn't really in a high positive state, but yet knowing that I would still run quicker than my 2010 time seemed to reassure me that I was still actually somehow running well, so overall I didn't feel negative at any time, which I guess is a bonus?  But having been convinced that I was still running well when in reality I wasn't, relative to what I know I am capable of, resulted in me not really pushing myself, not really trying very hard!  I eventually reach checkpoint 11 at Kentmere which is being run by the crew from Montane, one of my sponsors.  Again, it is great to see some familiar faces, and the positive energy received was a real boost.  Thanks.

Receiving Positive Energy at Checkpoint 11 Kentmere

Leg 12 Kentmere to Ambleside
This leg is pretty well a repeat of leg 11.  The positive energy I receive from the checkpoint gets me up and over the steep climb of Garburn Pass, with minimal issues with the legs.  But come the descent I again pay too much attention to the legs, although I discipline myself and refuse to walk the downhills, but the two miles of decent, with 124 and 137 metres of elevation drop still takes me nearly 24 minutes to complete!  I slowly make my way to the checkpoint at Ambleside.

Leg 13 Ambleside to Langdale
With three legs to go, I am pretty well on auto-pilot.  I am progressing quite slowly, managing to run most of the time, albeit slowly whenever it is flat or downhill.  But come any slight incline, then it provides an excuse to walk.  Why was I running so slowly I ask myself now, trying to reflect on two weeks ago.  Yes, the legs were uncomfortable, but no more than usual, probably the only difference was that the discomfort started earlier.  I guess the main reason for running so slowly was that there was no motive to run faster.  I was going to beat my 2010 finish time, hence a PB, so a good result!  But the problem now that I face, is that I know I am capable of much more.  Perhaps it could be interpreted that, "I was soft!"  I wimped out, I took the easy option, when the 'going got tough'!  Reflecting back now, part of me has this feeling.  For the last five legs, well actually the last seven legs, I was pretty well lacking in Race Focus. 

An argument perhaps could be made that it is due to my focus on racing, my focus on the competitive side of ultra trail running, that this is the underlying cause of my less than satisfying performance.  Maybe there is something in this, as very few ultra trail runners focus on the competition element, but I am not sure about this.  To me the Lakeland 100 is a race, and therefore involves competing against other runners in order to get to the finish line ahead of them.  Yes, it is also a personal challenge, but the time component of what constitutes a good performance is partly determined by how my finish time compares to the other runners.  But one plan for the future is to give some serious thought at looking into establishing clearer race goals which aren't competition determined.

Leg 14 Langdale to Tilbertwaite
Just before starting leg 14 in an effort to try to get myself running faster I ask the checkpoint crew the time gap to the runner in front of me.  He informs me that I am in 5th place (which is a surprise as since checkpoint 8 at Dalemain I had been in 6th position), and that I nearly 40 minutes behind.  He also informs me that back at CP12 ar Ambleside I was just over 30 minutes ahead of the following runner.  Both of these bits of information 'allow' me to continue running slowly.  There is no way I can gain the 40 minutes to gain a place, and even though I am running pretty slowly, it is highly unlikely that I will lose 30 minutes, and I conclude that even if the following runner does get close, I will be able to see him on the last climb getting closer and simply increase the pace.  So even during the race, I knew that I was capable of running quicker if I had to, but was taking the soft option!  So I continue my slow journey towards Coniston and reach checkpoint 14, the final checkpoint with no signs of the runner from behind.

Leg 15 Tilberthwaite to Coniston
I start the tough last climb, which begins with the infamous steps.  Two years ago my brother videoed me climbing these steps and I was really suffering.  Today, although tired, I am not anywhere near as exhausted as I was back then.  I guess further illustrating just how much I have progressed as an ultra trail runner over the last two years, in that I can be quite a bit quicker but with nowhere the same demands on my body and mind.

I make my way up the climb and as I slowly progress across the flatter part of the climb I glance behind me and see the following runner start his climb.  Yes he is getting closer to me, but all is fine.  Just in case though, for the first time since probably the start of leg 11 I increase my Race Focus Energy and work reasonably hard for the remainder of the gentle climb, up to the summit and start the final descent down to the gravel road we ran up nearly 24 hours earlier.  The descent is rather uncomfortable, but the excitement of the chase from behind gives me incentive to maintain a good pace and ignore the discomfort as I head down to the road.  I then make good progress along the final mile, running quite hard, and cross the finish line back at the school in a total time of 23 hours 45 minutes and 48 seconds.

Although this write-up and my perception of my running pace gives the indication that I was running very slowly over the second half of the race, and that this was mainly die to me being 'soft'.  Reflecting back on the last leg, where I had to increase the effort in order to stay ahead of the quickly finishing runner actually suggests that perhaps I didn't actually have that much left, and I wasn't going that easy, as after the last 30 minutes of increased effort I crossed the finish line pretty shattered!  However, the increased effort was necessary as a little under three minutes behind me, Gancho Slavov finishes in 6th place.

Well that was an ultra effort!  I doubt many readers will have got this far, if you have you definitely have ultra endurance qualities!  I sub-titled this post"Learning From and Planning for the Future".  Well hopefully my above report has illustrated that I have learnt quite a bit from this years Lakeland 100.  So planning for the future.  Firstly, having originally planned to return back to UTMB in 2013, the plan has changed, and I will be coming back to the Lakeland 100 in 2013.  In order to run to what I consider my true ability, I however, need to prepare differently to prevent the same massive slowing down during the last 5 - 7 legs.

I see two aspects to focus on here.  One is to do with my race goals, to ensure that these are clearly formulated, with sufficient detail to enable me to evaluate my progress towards achieving my race goals during the actual event.  I will also give some consideration to my emphasis to the competition element.  Secondly, I need to acknowledge that the issues I had with the lack of Race Focus Energy was possibly largely attributable to my physical preparation, in that my legs were pretty well trashed very early on in the race.  Although over my four years of ultra trail running, I have been a strong believer in there not being a real need to run large miles, having averaged only around 40 miles per week.  I am now having to reconsider this approach.  Yes, I have performed well during ultra trail races on this reasonably low mileage, but the majority of these races have been less than 50 miles.  In all three 100 mile races that I have finished, I have slowed significantly during the second half of the race.  So maybe 40 miles per week is fine for ultra races up to around 50 miles, but perhaps to really perform in 100 mile races, bigger mileage is required in order to 'protect' the legs and to give them that increased conditioning so there isn't the massive increase demand on the Race Focus Energy, simply to cope with the discomfort messages from the legs.

As  I have mentioned within my report, I am still on the upward learning curve when it comes to ultra trail running.  I guess this is the one aspect that makes ultra trail running so appealing.  In that one is continually learning and therefore continually improving.  I am really excited about experimenting with some new approaches to my ultra trail running within the coming year.

Time to sign off and finally get this blog post published.

I will sign off with a quote from Barry Murray's Lakeland 100 report.  I don't know whether it is his quote, or someone elses, but I can relate to it, and particularly like the emphasis on the expanding and learning.  I have just been informed that the quote is by Dean Karnazes.
"Struggling and suffering are the essence of a life worth living. If you’re not pushing yourself beyond the comfort zone, if you’re not demanding more from yourself – expanding and learning as you go – you’re choosing a numb existence. You’re denying yourself an extraordinary trip.” Dean Karnazes, 2006, from his book "Ultramarathon Man: Confessions of an All-Night Runner"
All the best with your continued learning,

Stuart