Sunday, 3 April 2011

Challenge66 - Quite a Challenge!

Hi

Just a short post tonight as I follow up on the Challenge66 Charity Run that I mentioned last month.  It involves Andy McMenemy running 66 Ultra Marathons in 66 Days, one from each of the 66 official Cities in the United Kingdom.

Well yesterday I joined Andy for his 18th Ultra in Hove Park, within the City of Brighton and Hove.  The 50km ultra started at 9am, coinciding with the Hove Park 5km Park Run.  This was my first experience of  Park Run, and what I saw looked great.  There was a friendly, supportive atmosphere, where runners of all ages and abilities were able to run 5km within Hove Park, on a smooth tarmacked path, at whatever pace they chose.  A chance to race, but for most just a chance to participate with around 300 other runners.

So Andy, myself, Martin (a runner from Bracknell training for the Edinburgh marathon) and a young lad from the ABS The Soldiers Charity started the 50km Ultra amongst the 5km runners.  The course consisted of a small loop of around 1.2km and then 2 laps of around 1.9km.  With this being Andy's 18th Ultra we started of at a conservative pace letting the 5km runners speed off, although throughout the first 5km we were constantly amongst other runners, including being lapped, and we finished in 280th equal place out of the 301 finishers.  The image below shows the small loop and the large laps of Hove Park.  The green arrow indicates the start.  The 5km Park Run ran in an anti-clockwise direction.


Immediately upon finishing the 5km, we simply turned around and ran back in the opposite direction, first the big lap twice and then the small loop to get back to the start, thereby covering 10km.  The young lad after completing the 5km swapped over with another youngster from The Soldiers Charity who jogged with us for a lap.  This process of changing direction and alternating small loops and large laps was to be repeated a total of 5 times, to register the 50 kilometres!  Our time for the first 5km was 32:50, with the next 5km taking 35:35, so the first 10km was completed in 1 hour 8minutes and 25 seconds.

As the three of us continued to run around Hove Park we simply chatted about various things, previous races we had run, our views on recovery, ice baths, types of shoes, briefly our day jobs, just to mention a few topics.  The pace was quite slow, and alternated between slightly less than 3 metres per second (around 9mins 30secss per miles) and slightly less than 2 metres per second (around 14 mins per mile) when we walked.  The images below are some traces from a mega expensive GPS unit I was wearing (see comments re GPS unit below).  Firstly the first 5kms, then a section of the first 5km zoomed in onto a transition from jogging to walking, then the 5km section from 20 - 25km, and finally the entire 25 kilometres I ran.









The path around Hove Park was quite undulating, especially if this was your 18th Ultra in 18 days and you were suffering from a torn Achilles tendon.  As was the case with Andy, although I must state that you wouldn't have known it, Andy only mentioned his injury once, at the start of the run, and then he never mentioned again.  Never having met Andy before yesterday, first hearing about the injury there was just that slight bit of apprehension that maybe Andy may be your typical runner, who loves talking about running injuries.  I wasn't sure how many hours of injury stories I could handle!!!  But no, I had no need to worry, Andy was a great guy, and was great company during the run.  Although Andy didn't repeatedly mention his injury, one could tell that he wasn't totally comfortable with his running, so frequently as the gradient changed to go uphill we would adjust to a brisk walk.

Working at the University of Brighton, our Sports Science Department had recently purchased some mega expensive GPS units  which are designed for team sports, that not only track the distance and speed covered by GPS, also contain accelerometers to measure each foot's impact with the ground.  So running the same circuit repeatedly I thought it would be interesting to test the units out.  I haven't had a close look at the acceleration data (Up within the above images), although one of the images above shows a zoomed in section as we transition from jogging to walking.  There is a significant decrease in vertical acceleration.  However, overall I was not impressed with the units.  We ran the same course repeatedly, however, the GPS trace shows quite different paths.  Rather poor tracking, heaps worse that my Garmin 305, which is about one fifteenth of the price!

As I started the run yesterday morning, I  hadn't decided how far I would run with Andy.  I wanted to support him and Challenge66 by running with him, but 50 km on road, consisting of 30 laps wasn't really my ideal run!  So during a short break for a toilet stop, Martin and I chatted about the durations of our runs.  He was intending to stop at 25 kms, so I thought rather than us dropping out separately, and possibly repeatedly affecting Andy's focus, I decided that I would stop also at the same time, at halfway.  So shortly after, we told Andy of our plans, which he was happy with.  He was very grateful for the company and support, no matter how short the distance we ran.

So after 3 hours 10 minutes and 39 seconds we completed our fifth 5 km course, thereby totalling 25km, and for Martin and myself we had completed our run for the day, Andy was just halfway!  Andy had a five minute lunch stop planned at 25km, so it was an opportunity for a few photos, and some final words of encouragement, before Andy got his ipod out from his kit bag and headed off for the remaining 25km with now music or podcasts to help past the time.  The photo below has Andy on the left of the photo, me in the middle, Martin from Bracknell on the right of the photo.  Taken after 25kilometres as Martin and I stop!



Overall I thoroughly enjoyed my mornings run.  Experiencing a Park Run for the first time was an added bonus.  The Park Run is a great concept, focusing running for inclusion, encouraging all abilities to get involved.  It reminder me of the Hagley Park Summer 5km Runs that I participated in back in Christchurch, New Zealand, way back during the summer of 1992/93!  Running with Andy was an interesting experience.  His adventure is titled Challenge66, and it is indeed a challenge, on two different levels.  Firstly there is the physical challenge.  Not in terms of cardiovascular fitness, but simply in terms of mechanical damage to the lower limbs.  Already Andy has a damaged Achilles tendon, and there are still 46 ultras to go!  But I think more demanding is that the actual routes, most of the runs consist of.  This being multiple laps within a park.  Therefore there isn't the usual enjoyment one gets when running, of getting somewhere, running through varying landscapes, over a variety of terrains.  I think for me, I 'm not sure how I would 'handle' the multiple laps.  I think the joy of running would rapidly disappear within a few days.  How Andy manages to keep going, lap after lap, day after day, is an amazing achievement and I wish him, and his support team, all the best for the remainder of their amazing journey.  If Andy is running near you over the coming weeks, I'm sure he would be grateful for some support.  His un schedule is listed on the Challenge66 website.

I will sign off with a quote posted on the Challenge66 website:  "Only those who will risk going too far ... can possibly find out how far one can go."  T.S. Elliot.

All the best to you all with your various challenges,

Stuart

Wednesday, 30 March 2011

Sussex Coastal Trail Marathon - Coping with the Challenges

Hi

Yes, I am back after managing to regain a positive attitude to computers following my rather disappointing loss of material from my last post. Apologies to Aykut, but your question will have to wait until my next post, as tonight I am focusing on my first race of the year, the Endurancelife Coastal Trail Series Sussex Marathon that I competed in last Saturday.

Back in January I outlined my planned races for the year, and expressed how excited I was, and that I was really looking forward to 2011 in terms of ultra trail racing, especially after coming back from my ‘summer training camp’ in New Zealand, full of energy and positivity. Well at 9:37am on Monday 7th February, I took a ‘wee bit’ of a tumble whilst skiing in Austria, which put a wee bit of a dampener on the start of the year.

It was another gorgeous morning, a stunning blue sky, fantastic scenery, great snow. I know the time exactly as I was pleased that after skiing some early runs, we had timed it perfectly to be a few minutes early for the 9:45 am start of the Advanced Ski Group lesson. So as I began a gentle blue run down to the top of the gondola to meet the University students on the Skiing and Snowboarding module, for the start of the ski lesson, I was thinking just how fortunate I was that my Monday morning at work was on the slopes of an Austrian mountain. Maybe I wasn’t paying enough attention to my immediate surroundings, or maybe paying too much attention to getting on my edges and letting the skis carve through the snow. Whatever the reason, my pleasant skiing was to come to an immediate halt! My last recollection is the blur of a skier approaching very fast from my right hand side. I had already commenced a turn to the left, so although I attempted to turn sharper, I vividly recall that sinking feeling that an impact was inevitable, and then there was the waiting for the collision, waiting for the pain!

What happened after that moment, I have no memory of! It is 20 minutes before I became aware of my surroundings, ‘waking up’ (although apparently my eyes were open during the entire 20 minutes) to a ski rescue paramedic bandaging my head, to stop the bleeding. I get a lift on the back of a skidoo, then down the gondola, into an ambulance and off to hospital.

I haven’t totally decided whether I was lucky or unlucky, but I only suffered a fractured upper-arm (humerus). The image below shows the fracture visible within the highlighted area. Then following the initial fracture, the massive bruising develops. Although due to ‘not being at home’ during and immediately following the ski crash, there was no pain, in fact I recall the peacefulness of the moment, being totally unaware of where I was. The eventual soreness became apparent over the following days and weeks, which subsequently resulted in the loss of three weeks run training!




Fortunately I did not consider the loss of three weeks training as being very detrimental to my overall race performance capabilities. Thirty years of run fitness isn’t ‘lost’ within three weeks. Secondly, as you have probably gathered from reading my posts, I strongly believe that performance in endurance running, specifically ultra running, but also in marathon running (but to a slightly lesser extent), is largely determined by self expectations. So as long as I believed my race performance would not be severely affected, then all should be fine.

So last Saturday I am on the start line of the Endurancelife Sussex edition of their 2011 Coastal Trail Series. Their Coastal Trail Series consists of 10 venues, and the Sussex venue was a new venue and consisted of; a 10km, half marathon, or marathon race. The publicised distance for the marathon was 26.7 miles, over the South Downs, covering a similar area to the Beachy Head Marathon that takes place in October each year, but with quite a different course, and which looked to contain more climbing.  Click HERE to see a map of the course.

My only previous experience of an Endurancelife race was back in July 2009 when I raced a 57 mile ultra titled “Classic Cliffs”. The Classic Cliffs Ultra was an extremely demanding course along the Cornwall and Devon Coastal Path. (Click HERE, to read my first ever race report of the event, before I developed into a blogger.) The Classic Cliffs Ultra was quite unique in that it started at midnight. There was a small field of only around 50 runners. Unfortunately the race no longer takes place as it was a really excellent event. Apart from remembering just how challenging the event was, I recall that the race was very well organized, with their being a friendly positive atmosphere throughout. So I was looking forward to experiencing another Endurancelife race, but this time on my 'doorstep', at Birling Gap near Eastbourne, where I typically run past in training probably around once per week.

As most of the coastal trail races typically involve running along narrow single coastal paths, a massed start would often result in the field queuing up shortly after the start. To avoid this problem, Endurancelife Coastal Trail Series races tend to start with a staggered start, where runners have to dib their dibbers in the control boxes before starting. This then spreads out the field and avoids any congestion. This approach seems sensible, and although it can mean that you are beaten by someone who crosses the finish line behind you, as long as you are aware that the finish place is based on dibber time, then not a problem. It actually encourages you to run hard right to the finish and not to take it easy if there is no one around you. Last Saturday from the results it appears that it took 2 minutes 19 seconds for the 86 runners from the main marathon start field to start.

The start of the race due to the dibbed start therefore immediately has a different feel to it, with not the same ‘excitement’ of a massed start. I am around the 7th runner to start so I immediately work hard to catch the leaders who started up to 10 seconds in front of me. The two leaders are busy chatting to each other as I catch them, I briefly say hello, and with the aim of the race being to test myself out, to evaluate whether indeed my performance level has been affected by my missing three weeks of running, slowing down for a chat wasn’t an option. So I take the lead, and although I have just experienced the staggered start, my internal perceptions are not used to this different start format. Running totally on my own within a minute of the start, with no other runners around me, results in my normal evaluation of when this situation as previously occurred. This being; “right you have this race under control”! I therefore relax and without the distraction of what other runners are doing, I am able to focus on working hard, extending myself beyond my usual relaxed and rhythm training, and enjoy the great scenery and the satisfaction of running fast.

The first part of the course runs over the Seven Sisters. These are seven small hills straight after each other. Running over the Sevens Sisters is really enjoyable, as it is like doing repetition work, not that I do that form of training very often nowadays. The steepness and length of the climbs vary, but with them being not too long, one can really attack them. Looking at my heart rate trace following the race (as I seldom look at the heart rate during the actual event), I can see that I was really enjoying myself as I attacked the short steep climbs, reaching a heart rate of 185bpm, which is only 2 beats less than my current maximum of 187! I think what made running over the Seven Sisters so more enjoyable this time was that usually during the Beachy Head Marathon, which I have raced nine times, you are usually pretty tired with it being around the 19 – 22 mile mark, so to be racing over the Seven Sisters totally fresh, really added to the occasion.  Click this link http://connect.garmin.com/activity/75155153 to view the GPS data on Garmin Connect.

After reaching Cuckmere Haven, the course then headed inland over a few more steepish climbs before the first check point and drink station at Litlington. Around thirty runners started 40 minutes ahead of the main marathon field so from around Litlington for the next 20 - 30 minutes or so I overtake all of these runners. Overtaking these runners is enjoyable, it reinforces just how fast I am running in relation to the early start marathon runners, and combined with the encouragement that these runners usually express, there is a boost to my positive energy levels. The course climbs gently out of Alfriston, and skirts along the bottom of The Old Man of Wilmington, before the highlight of the day, a demanding steep and quite lengthy climb to the summit of 214 metres, up above the Old Man. Knowing the area really well, as the course covers my usual training ground, I was well aware that upon reaching the top I would have a long gentle descent back towards Friston Forest. I therefore attacked the climb, although a bit more cautiously than the Seven Sisters due to the increased climb length. My peak heart rate up the steep climb was therefore only 179 bpm.

Shortly after starting the gentle descent I realise that my Garmin GPS watch has stopped, it later shows that I must have knocked the stop button just before Litlington. I restart the watch and try to make the most of the gentle descent. Although the mile split time shows 5:48, typically I would expect to get below 5:40 for a good downhill mile during a marathon (e.g. South Downs Marathon 2008, 2010). So it appears that my overall leg speed is not as quick as usual, which I didn’t really need the GPS to tell me, as during the descent it just didn’t feel as smooth and relaxed as usual.

Following the descent there are a few more climbs firstly through a portion of Friston Forest and then through the village of East Dean before descending back down towards Birling Gap on the south coast. Just before reaching Birling Gap, I join into the half marathon race at around their 2 mile mark, probably around two thirds through the field. With there being 260 half marathon runners, within an instant my internal focus, peacefulness, rhythm, relaxation is shattered. Whereas before when I overtook the early marathon starters it was a positive experience, I found joining into the half marathon race having a negative effect on me. It was as if I was an intruder to their race. As I overtook the half marathon runners, instead of receiving positive energy from the other runners as earlier in the race, I sensed negativity. It may just have been my own self created perception, but it felt as if there was a sense of “What is this guy doing? What is he playing at? Why is he doing a burst now? No problems, he’ll blow up, I catch him later! Perhaps he missed the start? He shouldn’t be late!” It could all just be in my mind and none of them were thinking these negative thoughts, but the consequence was that I went from an overabundance of positivity, with everyone I passed previously being aware that I was the race leader, i.e. the marshals, supporters, or spectators, they all gave out a positive response.  To the opposite, where now I am receiving or perhaps self creating loads of negativity.

I continue to work my way through the half marathon field, trying to focus on running strong, keeping the intensity high. The intensity tends to stay high, but it does seem to take a bit more ‘mental’ effort. Firstly up to the top of Beachy Head, which for the first time ever in a race, running into a strong headwind (All nine Beachy Head Marathons I have raced in have been either a tailwind or still), and then a steep drop down into Whitbread Hollow before check point 3 at the very start of the South Downs Way at Eastbourne.
A long steep climb back up towards Beachy Head allows me to overtake some more runners, but by this part of the race I am getting closer to the front of the half marathon field, so it now takes longer to overtake each runner, because they are running that bit faster the further up the field they are. However, although I know this, the subconscious perception is that I must be slowing down. I guess it is a bit like the way the spaces between the lines on the road get closer as you get nearer to a roundabout, to create the subconscious perception that you are getting faster.

The course then descends downs a picturesque narrow valley, one of my weekly training routes, before a couple of short steep climbs before a gradual climb back up towards Beachy Head for the final time. As we reach the top of the first short climb I am faced with a dilemma. All of the runners are going the wrong way; they are continuing up along the fence line rather than descending down into the next valley. I am around 90% confident that the correct route is straight ahead, but since every runner has taken the incorrect route, I decide to follow them, although knowing that I am going the wrong way! Although it shouldn’t make a difference, this running in the wrong direction, away from where I should be heading seems to create loads of internal self negativity. From that moment until the finish line, the racing ceased, the focus was gone, it just became a training run. My intensity dropped substantially, with an average heart rate of only 144 bpm for one of the mile splits! Instead of overtaking the half marathon runners, I am now running at their pace, and I am actually overtaken my two of them!

The runners upon reaching a fence realize they have gone the wrong way, so we all head back along a different route to rejoin the correct course. This off-course detour later appears to have added approximately 1.3 miles to both the marathon and half marathon routes. We pass through checkpoint 4 at the top of Beachy Head, with only a relaxing descent back down to the start/finish. Although the views from the top of Beachy Head are probably the most spectacular coastline views along the south coast one could find, by this stage I am looking forward to finishing and do not really make the most of the scenery. I finish in a time of 3 hours 33 minutes and 45 seconds, with only 18 half marathon runners in front of me, and being the first marathon runner to finish. Second place marathon finisher is Mike Martin, seven minutes later in 3:40:52. Third place is Andrew Woodrow 3:45:34. Women’s places are 1st Freya Bloor, 3:49:47, 2nd Camila Lewis 4:49:09, and 3rd Fiona Maguire 4:51:35.

So overall an enjoyable race; it was well organized, had great scenery, was very challenging in a number of ways, and had a friendly atmosphere throughout. These variety of challenges, some I responded to well, others, I need to work on, are what I will ‘take away’ and learn the most from competing in the Sussex Coastal Trail Marathon. Challenge (i) The Hills. I responded really well to the undulating nature of the course and the many climbs of varying lengths and gradients. I was able to attack the climbs, and work really hard up them. Although a heart rate of 185bpm is probably a little bit extreme, but hey why not, it heaps of fun! Just an aside, some of you readers out there may be thinking, “Shouldn’t we try to run at a constant intensity? Isn’t even intensity the best approach?” Well, yes, I guess it is time for another one of UltraStu’s philosophies. It has been quite a while since my previous two:

From the post, March 2010 - Hardmoors 55 Ultra Trail Race - Reflections on Pace Judgement
"Run as fast as you can, while you can!"
From the post, May 2010 - What Determines Performance in Ultra Running? - Part Two
"To run faster in ultra trail races, train slower! Your training pace should enable your running to be relaxed, smooth, flowing, cruisey, and in total rhythm, with positivity and joy. For the vast majority of your runs, do not train hard!"

So tonight’s philosophy:
“During endurance trail running races, to improve overall finish time, increase the intensity substantially when running up hills. Whatever you do, do NOT reduce the intensity when encountering a hill during an endurance race.”

The reason that you should increase your intensity when running / or power walking up hills, is that your aim is to reduce the duration of time at which you are travelling at a slower pace. I’m sure the mathematicians out there will be able to explain it better, but it all gets down to overall time and averages. If you are running slow for a long duration of time, e.g. up a hill, you cannot gain this time back by running fast down the hill, because the duration of time at which you are running fast is a shorter duration. So the key to reducing the overall race time, is to reduce the time at which you are running slow, so substantially increase the intensity when encountering hills. This may be contrary to what most people recommend for ultra trail running. The common misconception is that the hills are a chance to take it easy, a time to walk. Well unfortunately, this approach is totally wrong, and the mathematics totally confirms this, although first I will leave it up to a mathematician runner out there to illustrate before I get my calculator out and try!

Sorry for going off on a bit of a tangent (all that maths is coming back to me)!  Back to the challenges for the Sussex Coastal Trail Marathon.  Challenge (ii) The merging into the half marathon field, for whatever reason resulted in my positivity being reduced. Now, my performance during endurance events is largely dependent upon ensuring that I remain positive throughout. In previous races I have let negativity develop and have subsequently performed lower that what I was capable of, e.g. Highland Fling 2009 getting lost! I think the take home message for me from this race experience is that I need to prepare myself to be ready for whatever I encounter during the race. The race details made it quite clear that we would join in with the half marathon field. I therefore should have included within my preparation consideration of this, and been ready for my peacefulness and internal focus to be distracted. I guess this leads into a future post topic regarding the importance of visualization during preparation/training.

Challenge (iii) The later part of the course on Saturday involved running very close to the finish area and heading off further away, then quite a bit of heading towards then away again from the finish area, before finally reaching the finish. Although I was aware of this feature of the course prior to race day, I obviously hadn’t prepared myself fully, as during this portion of the race I found this aspect of the course led to some negativity. Although on occasions I have gone off course in races, I do tend to have a good sense of direction, and so I was well aware of this constant changing of direction. Again, it gets down to a more thorough preparation required prior to race day, ensuring that I am prepared for all aspects of the course that I will encounter.

Challenge (iv) Following the other runners and knowingly going off-course thereby extending the length of the course also had a negative effect on me which severely hindered my performance. For the last four miles I was no longer racing. The negativity had taken over and I was now doing a training run! I guess the key take home message here is that I must have totally clear before commencing the race, a number of goals to focus on. I must be totally clear on what I hope to achieve from the event. The main purpose from last Saturday’s race was to test myself out, to evaluate my current performance level, following a break in training due to my ski crash. However, in addition, the goal was to run a quick time which I would consider appropriate for the terrain. Thirdly, there was the goal to win the race. So when it became apparent that we would be running extra distance due to running off course, the quick time goal became redundant. I had already achieved the other two goals, so at that moment in time, there didn’t appear to be any rationale to keep on racing, hence losing race focus and the dramatic drop in intensity. A good lesson to be learnt here, in that there must always be a goal to work towards. There always needs to be a purpose to keep on racing hard.

Well, this post has been a bit of a marathon effort. Hopefully you have managed to get through it! Time to sign off with a repeat of my words of wisdom above, with regards to increased intensity on hills.

“During endurance trail running races, to improve overall finish time, increase the intensity substantially when running up hills. Whatever you do, do NOT reduce the intensity when encountering a hill during an endurance race.” Stuart Mills, 2011.

All the best as your prepare for future challenges,

Stuart


The photo above ia at around the 15 mile mark, shortly after I joined in with the half marathon race.  The Seven Sisters are visible in the background.  Those observant amongst you may notice that I am racing in trail shoes.  Yes, for the very first time I am racing in trail shoes.  They are Inov8 Roclite295s. although mine only weight 275 grams as they are size 7.  The change in approach from running in lightweight road shoes, that I have always raced in, is due to the lightness of these trail shoes, and also because Inov8 gave them to me.  Always a bonus!  But having worn them for the first time in a race, I am beginning to think that maybe I have been 'missing a trick' by previously racing in road shoes.  They felt nice and light, but also provided an amazing security underfoot on each step.  Although the course was 'bone dry' on Saturday, whilst training in them over slippery ground I have particularly noticed the improvement in my traction and subsequently an improvement in by running.

Tuesday, 15 March 2011

Challenge66 and Cross Training

Hi, welcome back.

Thanks to those of you that have used the new "Email Your Question" button and e-mailed me a question.  I will incorporate my responses to these questions within future blog posts over the coming weeks.  Please keep the questions coming.  Before I respond to the first question, which is to do with 'Cross Training' I would like to draw your attention to an amazing Ultra Running Challenge that starts tomorrow, on the 16th March.

The challenge is titled Challenge66.  The following is taken directly from the website.

Challenge66 will see Andy McMenemy, the son of a former soldier establish a new Guinness World Record for consecutive ultra marathons (50km) with no rest days. During Challenge66 Andy will run 66 Ultra Marathons in 66 Days, one from each of the 66 official Cities in the United Kingdom.
 

As Andy runs an ultra marathon in the 66 official cities across the United Kingdom over 66 days, he will be raising money for ABF The Soldiers Charity.  If you go to the website http://www.challenge66.org/ you can see how to get involved, by either running with him or volunteering to help with the organisation of a run in one or more of the cities. 

I have just signed up to run 50 kilometres with him on Saturday 2nd April in Brighton.  So if any of you are near Brighton on the 2nd of April, it would be great if you could come along and join us.  The 50km route is going to be a real challenge!  Not your usual ultra trail route along bridleways and footpaths, or over the Downs, but multiple laps (probably around 30!) of Hove Park!!!  I'm not sure how I will respond to this challenge, but it should be quite an experience.

On the website there are links to how you can donate money to this very worthy charity.  If you click on Schedule you can see when Andy is in a city close to where you are.  While on the Schedule page if you then click the 66 logo next to Brighton, you can donate money to the charity, which will help boost the donations specifically from the Brighton City Challenge66 50km run.  Alternatively click the 66 logo next to your preferred city.

How somebody prepares for such a challenge is obviously interesting, as is the motivation behind the Challenge.  Andy McMenemy discusses these aspects as well as other 'bits and pieces' during an interesting discussion with Julia Armstrong in this week's podcast, which is linked to from the Running Free website.


Now onto a follower's question, which comes all the way from Istanbul, Turkey.  Aykut e-mailed me stating how he had just recently improved his road marathon time from 4 hours to 3 hours 27 minutes, and that he felt that my blog had helped him achieve his goal.  (Which is reassuring and nice to know!)

Your "run fast while you can" motto was very intriguing for me. And the other thing is the "always think positive" attitude that you constantly mention.  I decided I'd start with a sub 3:30 pace and try to keep that pace for 30K and then see what happens. Whenever negative thoughts emerged during the race, I'd remind myself about your thinking positive approach and it worked well.  So I can safely say that your blog really helped me.
Hi, I am very sorry but for some strange reason the remainder of Aykut's question and my response has just disappeared!!!  This is the first time this has happened to me, but I guess this is a good lesson in that I should type my posts into say a word document and then frequently save when I choose to, rather that relying on the blog site to save the post.  As although the blog site saves it frequently, I must have somehow deleted the bottom half of the post and then it automatically saved it!!!  So frustrating!!!

During last summer I read a sociological PhD on endurance running.  The author found it quite contradictory how endurance runners who were inspired and motivated by the outdoors would then spend hours indoors on computers writing and reading blogs!  The two activities appeared to him to be quite opposing.  Well after tonight's frustrating experience, I definitely know what I prefer doing, so it may well be a wee while before I respond to the half commenced question above.

All the best with the blogging!

Stuart

Just to finish off, remember to take a look at the Challenge66 website.

ANDY HAS STARTED HIS CHALLENGE. CLICK THE LINK TO SEE AN ARTICLE WITH PHOTOS FROM DAY ONE IN LEEDS

http://www.yorkshiredailyphoto.com/2011/03/challenge-66-leeds.html


Friday, 4 March 2011

Ask a Question - Maybe I Will Have Some 'Words of Wisdom'!

Hi Again,

Yes, exactly a month since my last post!  Those of you who have followed my blog for a while may have noticed that the frequency of my posts have reduced quite a bit recently.  Having a break from racing, hence no race reports to post is one reason for the decrease, however, I feel like I have covered quite a few topics within my earlier posts and I don't want to start repeating myself.

When I set up this blog last March the intention was to "try to stimulate thought amongst other ultra runners", and "although I will be sharing my thoughts on various things to do with ultra running, it is not to suggest that others do the same, but more for the readers of my blog to simply question what they do. Is an alternative approach worth a try?" (Post No. 3)

Over the last year I have received a number of positive comments to my posts, as well as a number of encouraging e-mails like the one below;

Hi Stuart,

Just wanted to say how much your blog has helped me with my running. Most of all you have given me the confidence to adopt my own beliefs on what works for me rather than being overwhelmed with what I 'should' be doing.   ..............    Anyhow, just wanted to pass on my thanks and say 'keep up the good work'. Its refreshing to think there are people out there that have the ability to look at the wider picture.
It therefore is apparent that on occasions my posts have stimulated some thought and encouraged consideration of alternative approaches to ultra trail running.  So instead of posting nothing at the risk of repeating myself, I have decided that maybe I should ask you, the reader, what topics would you like me to offer my thoughts on.  If you look to the right you should now see a new ?EMAIL YOUR QUESTION tab.


If you click this tab, it should load my e-mail address into Microsoft Outlook, or whatever programme you use to send e-mails.  Then all you have to do is type in a subject title and ask me a question on a topic you have been thinking about, related to Ultra Trail running.  Then within the following week or two, I can give your question some thought and then post my views regarding the topic.  I just thought this approach could be worth a try, in order to re-increase the frequencies of my posts, so I can continue to stimulate thought amongst you readers out there.

Just before I sign off, a brief story to introduce my signing off quote.  Whilst in New Zealand over Christmas my Dad moved out of our family home which we had lived in since 1964.  As I was helping in packing up, I came across loads of things from the past that brought back loads of pleasant memories, including a number of old running books.  Kiwis Can Fly (1977) was great to read again.  Mainly about great New Zealand athletes John Walker, Rod Dixon and Dick Quax, but also other NZ athletes such as Boston Marathon winner from the sixties Dave McKenzie.  One other book really gained my attention; Every Runners Companion by Alison Roe and Gary Elliott (1983).  A few of you may not be aware of Alison Roe's status.  She won both the Boston Marathon and the New York Marathon in 1981, setting a world marathon record of 2:25:29 at New York.  I have pasted her photo from the book below as I consider it such an awesome photo.  It was taken during the 26th mile of the New York Marathon, which she covered in 5:08.  I can feel from the photo the busyness of the crowd, the motorcycle escort beside her, but yet she appears so relaxed, focused, at peace within herself.  She is running hard, no signs of strain, simply really enjoying the present moment! 



Back in 1981 Alison Roe was a real inspiration to me as a young runner, especially as I had run my first marathon the year earlier as a seventeen year old.  So when her book came out I immediately bought it.  Although the book consists mainly of training log pages for the runner to fill out, throughout the book are short sections where Alison Roe, but mainly Gary Elliott, her coach, express their 'Words of Wisdom'.  I recall at the time back in 1983 that I wasn't overly impressed with their thoughts.  It all seemed too much 'airie / fairie', too much to do with the mental approach.  At that time I thought running performance was all physically determined!  Reading again now, with me now having 30 years of running wisdom to draw upon, Gary Elliott definitely had it sorted back then, and he was able to pass on his 'wisdom' sufficiently for Alison Roe to be the best in the world during 1981.  What is interesting is that back then I couldn't see it, I wasn't ready to 'think outside of the box'.  I think this just further illustrates that we need to continue to adjust our perceptions of ourselves as we continue to learn and develop over time.

No doubt over the coming months I will expand upon some of Gary Elliot's thoughts, but I will start tonight with probably my favourite quote of his.  It seems to follow on nicely from some of my recent posts regarding self expectations.

"The way we perform is the result of the way we see ourselves.  To alter our performance we need to alter or change ourselves and it is that changing that's difficult."  Gary Elliot (1983).
I look forward to receiving your questions.

Keep on questioning,

Stuart

Friday, 4 February 2011

Plans for 2011 - How to Adjust My Self Expectations?

Hi, welcome back,

Well after a bit of time giving various races some thought I have decided upon my key races for the year.  Having moved up to 100 mile races in 2009 and 2010, the intention was to race another 100 mile event in 2011.  Which event though?  A new race, or a repeat run?  Ultra Trail Mont Blanc in 2009 was absolutely amazing.  Lakeland 100 in 2010 was equally impressive, a great course and superbly organised.  In the end I have decided to head out to Chamonix again at the end of August.

Some of you may be thinking, why not just do both!  I know there are a few out there that have entries for both, (entries now closed for both races), however, for me, I am such a 'wreck' after racing 100 miles that I know there would be no way that I could complete both events, being only four weeks apart.

So with the number one focus for the year decided upon, the number two focus was easy: The Montane Highland Fling, at the end of April.  I last ran 'The Fling' back in 2009, and somehow managed to run off-course.  So there is a bit of 'unfinished business' for me to put right this year.  The remainder of the year consists of a marathon or two for a bit of 'speed work', with the Endurance Life Sussex edition of the Coastal Trail Series being targeted.  Ideal, as the start is only 10 miles away from where I live.  I'll probably 'throw in' one or two other races from the Runfurther Ultra Series during the year, and then my local Beachy Head Marathon at the end of October, to run for my 10th time, to finish the year off with.

Thanks for the comments following my review of 2010 post.  I took a look at Anton Krupicka's blog.  There I was, pretty pleased with myself at running 2276 miles during 2010, and then I see that this chap ran 6285 miles!  But I am still pleased with myself.  As previously mentioned I am not truly convinced that running more miles will simply lead to improved performance in ultra trail racing.  Yes, it will result in that you will be able to race more than one 100 miler a year.  However, for a one-off 100miler each year, what benefits will it give me in response to the increased time commitment?

Yes, one of the reasons that I run only around 2000 miles per year is due to the time involved.  I am fortunate that I have other more important things in my life than ultra trail running.  I have a wife and two young boys, hence why the two mornings I get up earliest each week, are Saturday and Sunday, in order that my running doesn't 'eat into' too much of the weekend.  The other reason, is simply that I am just a lazy trainer.  I always have been!  I guess it is largely due that for me, the result of the race is not the sole purpose why I run.  Yes I love the competition, and I enjoy achieving good results in races, but it doesn't mean 'everything' to me, so I find I don't really have that 'win at all costs' approach to my training.

However, coming onto 2011, having noticed that my performances have been pretty well 'stagnant' for the last three years, I feel that now is the time to re-adjust my self expectations, and raise them up a 'notch or two'!  The only problem is that in order to deep down believe in the heightened self expectations, you have to have some evidence, some substance to justify the expected improvement.  So this then gets back to training.  What do I need to do to provide that evidence?

Well luckily I don't think increasing my mileage substantially is necessary.  Good, no need to invest loads more time!  But what then?  Well to answer this question I have recently been going through my splits for last July's Lakeland 100 race, and my splits for my recce run. Within my Lakeland 100 race report titled "Lakeland 100 - The Importance of Preparation - Developing Positivity and Self Belief" I commented on how I felt my pace slowed drastically during the last 6 legs of the race.  Well looking at my leg split times for the race and for my recce run, it really did confirm this.  Take a look at the table below.



I ran my recce run on three consecutive days back in May.  Apart from the first leg on day one, which was actually leg 11 of the race, I ran at a pretty comfortable relaxed pace throughout.  I therefore thought it would be useful to compare race split times to this comfortable training pace.  Some interesting observations appear.

Probably the key aspect, which still amazes me, is just how slow I ran the last six legs, although due to getting lost on leg 10 of my recce I don't actually have any comparative data for this leg.  Although I know that leg 10 was my 'worst', slowest leg of the entire race!  The real question is why did I slow so much?  I know many of you will probably be thinking it is due to my stupid fast start, and I really do need to change my blog title to UltraStupid!  However, I have total belief that my "Run as fast as you can, while you can" philosophy works more me.  I expect I would have slowed the same amount for the last six legs even it I had started slower.  Only difference would be that I would then have two or three other runners running beside me!

So, why did I slow down?  Those of you that have read my post from last May titled "What Determines Performance in Ultra Running? - Part Two" will know that I belief ultra trail running performance is all about "the ability to remain within a 'positive state of being, a positive state of mind', while all of the many negative states from various sources are being initiated."  Looking at my list of potential negative sources, I seemed to have missed one.  Well I'm not really sure if it is actually a negative source.  It is as if the 'mind' gets fatigued.  I try not to separate the mind and body, as they are all one.  But sometimes it makes it easier for understanding the process.  Reflecting deeply on the Lakeland 100 race, it was as if the mind was no longer able to maintain that 'Within the now focus', where you are creating the impulse to run fast, to run just out and beyond your 'comfort zone'.  It is as if the mind has decided that after so many hours of race focus, it has had enough.  I am confident that it is not as simple as physical fatigue.  I wasn't short of fuel, my intensity was so low I wouldn't have been utilising much carbohydrate.  I wasn't dehydrated.  Yes I had severe muscle damage, which I think does play a major role in determining just how long the 'mind' can continue at 'race focus'.  So yes, physical fatigue does play its part.

So the secret is to develop 'race focus' endurance.  So this will be my new strategy with my training for 2011, to provide the required evidence, to provide substance for my, to be adjusted, raised self expectations.  How exactly do I develop 'race focus' endurance?  Not by drastically increasing my miles.  What I think the key is, is to increase the intensity on some of my long 20+ mile runs.  To put the mind under stress, so it has to work hard to run just out and beyond its comfort zone.  One method may also be the use of multiple consecutive long runs, to really work on the mind endurance.  Although it is really important that negative states don't develop by over extending the mind into too much 'discomfort'.

As 2011 begins, I am therefore excited and optimistic about my new thoughts on training for ultra trail running, with a planned few tweaks to my training.  The majority of my training will stay the same, with focus on rhythm and relaxation, to continue to develop the positivity and running economy, which are always capable of continued improvement!

I hope you have managed to work your way through my at times rather random thoughts.  I'm still in the process of trying to work it all out!

Time to sign off:  "One of the real 'magics' of ultra trail running is that the secret to performance, is just that, a secret!  The joy one can receive, is in the continued ambition and execution to discover aspects of the 'secret', with the knowing that there will always be more to discover."  Stuart Mills, 2011


Happy 'discovering' during 2011,

Stuart
PS  To those readers out there who live in the United States please take a look at this website:

http://freshairmarathon.com/

The Fresh Air Fund is looking for runners and sponsors to join the Fresh Air Fund-Racers team for the NYC Half-Marathon this coming March 20th.  It looks a worthy charity, so please give it a look.  Thanks, Stuart

Saturday, 29 January 2011

Running Review of 2010 - 2276 miles - What Does It Mean?

Hi

Yes, I am a little bit late with this, but at least it is still January, just!

For the last 33 years I have recorded my training.  So often as I prepare for a race I dig out the old training diaries and look at what I have previously done.  I tend to find it extremely beneficial as I learn from the experience gained from running 37,443 miles!!!  Having read a few other ultra runner's reviews of their year recently, I will include in my review some of the statistics they have used. 

The number one statistic to start with is my total mileage of 2276 miles.  In a post last April titled Is More Always Better? I reviewed my yearly mileage totals for the previous 32 years.  Well with 2276 miles, 2010 was my fourth highest running mileage year.  My highest since 1984!



So why the increase in miles during 2010?  No specific reason apart from probably enjoying my running even more at the moment. Not really a performance focused motive, as I was not truly convinced that running extra miles would make me perform better in ultra trail races! 

The graph and table above compare my monthly mileages between 2009 and 2010. During 2008 and 2009, I typically only ran 5 times per week, so at the start of 2010 I made the conscious decision to typically run 6 times per week.  Although it felt like I typically ran 6 days per week during 2010, once you add in the extra days rest due to easing off prior to a race, having extra days off immediately following a race, then a week off due to skiing, and occasional extra days off due to other reasons, it actually ends up with an overall average of exactly 5 days running per week!

2010 - 260 runs, 105 rest days, total 2276 miles, average of 8.8 miles per run
2090 - 195 runs, 170 rest days, total 1783 miles, average of 9.1 miles per run
2008 - 199 runs, 167 rest days, total 1806 miles, average of 9.1 miles per run.

The only month during 2010 when I didn't run more that 2009 is the month of August.  This is lower than 2009 as in 2009 I raced UTMB in August.  Having raced the Lakeland 100 near the end of July during 2010, the following few weeks I also took it quite easy.

So looking back at 2010, has the extra day running per week, i.e. the extra 493 or 470 miles over the previous two years respectively aided performance?  I guess to assess this, one needs to look at my race performances over the last three years.

The races highlighted in red are where I raced the same course in different years. Looking at the Beachy Head Marathon and the South Downs Marathon results it tends to indicate that I have pretty well stayed constant in performance over the last three years.  I improved 15 minutes in the Marlborough 33 mile ultra race, but I think most, if not all of this, was largely due to being ill in 2009.

Each year I set myself a target race and therefore gear my training for that one race.  For the last two years, my target race has been over 100 miles, i.e. Lakeland 100 (actually 104 miles) and Ultra Trail Mont Blanc at 103 miles.  Therefore my training composition has recently changed to take account of the 100+ mile focus.  I have therefore decreased the number of tempo/fartlek type sessions, and increased the rhythm/relaxation sessions.  This is in response to 100 mile races being less dependent upon physiological influences, than they would be for say marathon or short ultra races.  In terms of how physiology relates to performance, as I have stated before, my understanding is that the key physiological determinant for ultra running is running economy, which is strongly related to muscular resistance to fatigue.  The longer the race, the greater its importance, and therefore an increased emphasis on rhythm/relaxation sessions, which I believe will benefit running economy and reduce muscular fatigue.

So have my performances in 100 mile races improved?  This is hard to gauge with not having run the same 100 mile event twice, although this will change during 2011.  I have been reasonably pleased with both of my performances in the Lakeland 100 and UTMB, although, I know that there is plenty of room for improvement.  The secret is knowing what it is I need to do in order to turn this underlying belief of improvement, into reality!  What exactly is required to allow it to happen?  Maybe looking at the composition of my running during 2010 may provide some clues?  Below is a summary based on some statistics listed by other bloggers.

Looking at the table, I guess my key physical training consists of the long runs, 16 miles and over, as 15 miles and less isn't really long in relation to racing 100+ miles!  Very seldom do I tend to run longer than 20 miles in training, unless it is a special/unique run.  The eight 20+ mile runs during 2010 consisted of: four race route recce runs (Lakeland 100 - 3 consecutive days, Pumlumon), three runs while in New Zealand, and a Wealde Way run.  Should I be doing more than this?  If you combine these eight 20+ runs with seven races, then it does begin to total up.  Will I look to do more during 2011?  Undecided at the moment, all dependent upon evaluating the purpose/the benefit I will gain, from doing more long runs.  I need more time to think, so it is probably best to leave this topic for my next post: Planning and Goals for 2011.

Just to finish off I will post two more images illustrating my weekly breakdown.  Probably not that overly interesting, but since all my data was in excel, why not produce them!  Note the increase in mileage during December. The benefits of my summer training camp in New Zealand while everyone else in the UK battled with the cold and snow!



Time to sign off with a quote from my What Determines Performance in Ultra Running? - Part Two post from last year, which seems relevant and worthy of repeating:
"In order to address what training is appropriate, one must first consider what limits performance!" Stuart Mills, 2010.
Still more reflection and thinking required!

All the best with your planning for 2011,
 
Stuart

Thursday, 20 January 2011

Changes Over Time - The Need to Change Expectations

Hi, yes I do still exist!

Well it has been quite a while since my last post.  I have even been shamed on John Kynaston's "Blogs Hall of Shame" for it being two months since my last post!  The reason?  None really apart from I guess my summer training camp in New Zealand, which resulted in me being pretty busy before going, and following my return.  I call it a summer training camp but it was actually a family holiday, catching up with family and friends.  But whilst we were there I did manage to fit in quite a few runs.  So I am now back in the UK, all raring to go for 2011, having run some good miles to finish 2010 off with.  Unfortunately though, I am not quite as 'skinny' as expected, largely as a result of too many barbeque's, beers and ice creams!  Oh well, plenty of time before my first race to sort that out.

Having not written a post for two months, I have a number of topics at mind; review of 2010, goals for 2011, new sponsors, etc.  But before any of these topics, firstly I will reflect on my trip back to New Zealand, and hopefully try to add a bit more to the topic I started way back at the start of November titled "Developing Positive Self Expectations - Part 1".  So tonight's post is titled "Changes Over Time - The Need to Change Expectations".

It was the beginning of December that we flew out to New Zealand.  Apart from the movies on the plane there was a Golden Classics section which included the TV programme Charlie's Angels.  Not sure if it showed on TV over in the UK, but I used to watch it every week in New Zealand back in the seventies!  I remember it as a really good programme!  Well what a surprise I got as I watched it on the plane.  It was absolute 'trash'!  I managed to watch about 30 minutes of it and then couldn't bear it any more!  So what has this got to do with Ultra Running I can sense you asking???  Well it got me thinking about how I have changed over the years, since being a teenager enjoying watching Charlie's Angels.  The strange thing is that I hadn't really realised that I had significantly changed, as the changes had been very gradual.  In my post titled Developing Positive Expectation - Part 1 there is the following paragraph:

"Now, I have been running for many years. I am running my umpteenth half marathon. What pace do I run at? Simply a pace similar to my previous runs in half marathons. How do I know that this is the right pace. It simply feels right! What happens if I find that I am closer to the front, quite a bit ahead of all of the other runners that are usually around me? I question, should I be this far near the front, in front of the others, and relate back to my expectation of what I expect I am able to achieve, and then adjust the pace accordingly, in most occasions probably easing of the pace, being conservative, so I don't 'blow up', even though no-one is able to actually define what 'blowing up' is!"

The key point from this paragraph is that the pace we run at in a race tends to be based on previous experiences.  We run at a pace that we expect we are able to maintain.  The only problem with looking back at previous performances is that you may not actually appreciate how you as an athlete have changed / have developed.  With reflection of races, it is capable to learn from every race, therefore capable to improve.  But looking back at my running over the past 30+ years, I don't think I acknowledged that I was capable of improving my performance simply due to the 'wisdom' gained from race experiences.  I used to think that performance was entirely determined by physical preparation, not other factors.  So even though I was improving and learning from my racing, my actually performances weren't improving, as my self expectations were based on the past.  And as I have mentioned before in many posts, I now strongly believe that how well one performs is largely determined by one's self expectations.  Because the changes in my 'ability' occurred at such a slow rate, I didn't acknowledge that I was now a better runner, so my performances didn't reflect me being a better runner.

I'm not really sure what I am trying to get across here within this post.  I guess the message is that perhaps one needs to 'step back a bit from oneself', and try to evaluate how one has developed as a runner.  Try to compare oneself with what one now knows about running, compared with what one knew a few years ago.  And with that increased experience due to running many, many miles, and many races, one is capable of RAISING one's self expectations.  Expect more from oneself.  People change as an athlete, just as they change as a person.  Most people over time, probably like myself, would no longer find Charlie's Angels enjoyable!  One must acknowledge the change, and expect more from oneself.  Otherwise, they may be like I was, always expecting the same level of performance from oneself, and therefore limiting oneself!  Hopefully you can follow the above.  Apologies, I guess I'm a bit blog 'rusty' with it being so long since my last post!

Back to my New Zealand trip, but I will return to this "Acknowledge Change" theme as I progress through my holiday. First stop in New Zealand was Wellington, my home town, and my first big run of the trip was a 25 year anniversary run of an awesome run that I had completed way back in 1985 when I was 22 years old.   At the time I was pretty fit, as I was in training for the 1986 Coast to Coast race, that consisted of some cycling, kayaking and a pretty tough off road run, on a tramping track, up over a descent climb down in the South Island.  Living in Wellington, bottom of the North Island, I identified the 22 mile Southern Crossing tramping (hiking) track, that goes from the Otaki Forks on the west coast of the lower North Island up to a height of around 1500 metres, before finishing at Kaitoke within the Hutt Valley, as an ideal training run.  At the time back in 1985 only trampers (hikers) would walk the crossing, I hadn't known of anyone that had ran it.  (It wasn't until 1990 that the Southern Crossing Mountain Race first took place,) But I thought it would be great training, so on the 15th December 1985, myself, running friend Mark Higham, who had been the New Zealand Junior Under 20 Road Champion in 1983 so he could run a 'wee' bit, his brother, who was a high standard orienteer, and his friend, also a top quality orienteer, all started the run over the Southern Crossing. 

Back then it was a real adventure, there weren't such things as camelbaks so we had to rely on water at the three huts we passed on route.  No high energy bars such as Cliff Bars.  There weren't even any lightweight thermal clothing.  I think I ran in a wool vest!  Although December, when it should have been the start of summer, I remember that it was a pretty wet and cold day!  My training diary from 1985 states 8 hours 55 minutes total time, consisting of 6 hours 50 minutes actual running.  I recall we had two lengthy stops at two huts, boiling up some hot water for a hot orange drink to help get ourselves warm! 

So 25 years later, unfortunately running it on my own, as none of my running friends from 25 years ago were either capable of running for seven plus hours, or excited by the prospect to want to do it!  So I catch the bus from Wellington up the coast to Otaki.  It is around 11 miles on first sealed road then gravel road before I reach the Otaki Forks where the tramping track starts.  Knowing that on the very exposed ridge above Kime Hut it can get extremely windy and cold, I am well prepared with emergeny blanket and loads of spare clothing and food.  So my Inov-8 pack is pretty heavy with around 1.5 litres of water and all of my spare clothing, as it is a beautiful sunny day, so I am enjoying running in just a t-shirt.

The two images below show the route and the elevation profile of my run. 



Clicking the link http://connect.garmin.com/activity/62507800 takes you to the Garmin website with the GPS and heart rate data.  As the data shows, I am cruising along at around 7 - 7:30 minute miles before I hit the start of the track, where the pace dramatically drops due to the steep climb.  To cut a long story short, I have a great run, up and over the tops, and as I start along Marchant Ridge, before the final gentle descent down to Kaitoke, I am up on schedule on my time from 1985.  It looks like my time from Otaki Forks to Kaitoke will be around 6 hours 30 minutes running time (which is the same as my total time as I am not having any breaks at huts this year).  Unfortunately, somehow I get on the wrong track and end up descending very steeply down off the ridge, down into the narrow valley containing Smith Creek. With the track next to the creek being washed away, combined with a slightly longer route, with an extra hill at the end, the navigation mistake adds loads of time to my run.  Which isn't really a problem, apart from not being able to directly compare my running time to 1985, although my brother Graham, waiting at the end of the track to pick me up wasn't overly pleased! 

Back to the theme of "Acknowledging Change", what should I have expected in terms of how long it would take me to run the Southern Crossing?  Physiologically, in terms of VO2max, although I haven't got any data to confirm it, my VO2max would have been substantially higher in 1985.  Back in 1984, 1985 I was able to race 10 miles on the road in around 52 - 53 minutes.  Although I don't race on the road now, I would expect that probably 56 - 57 minutes would be my likely time now!  However, I would expect (as evidenced from research) that my running economy would be substantially better now in comparison with 1985.  And as ultra endurance performance is physiologically predominantly determined by running economy, this improvement in running economy will benefit me immensely on a seven hour run.  So overall my expectation in running the Southern Crossing was that I would run it quicker in 2010 than in 1985.  On both occasions I wasn't racing it / wasn't running it particularly hard, just running at that comfortable training pace, so intensity wise probably similar.  Although due to going off course, I don't really know for sure, indications were that I was going to be a little bit quicker in 2010.

I guess one 'take home' message from this 25 year anniversary Southern Crossing run is that it is important to reflect on how one has changed, in all aspects, not just the physical/physiological, and most importantly, to relate this to what determines performance in ultra trail running.  I state above that I expected to complete the run quicker in 2010 due to possible physiological reasons, but in reality, my confidence in expecting to complete the run quicker was due to my improved mental state.  Back in 1985, the thought of running the Southern Crossing was rather 'daunting'!  Last month, it was just another longish run!  No apprehension, no doubt!  Remember, expectations so often lead to reality.  What one expects, one often gets!

Oh no!  This post is looking like becoming a bit of a marathon effort to start 2011 off with, but I just want to reflect on one last story from my time back home in Wellington.  Back in 1985 the running scene in New Zealand was very strong.  We would have around 300 - 400 senior men run the Centre Championships, the Centre being I guess equivalent to an English County.  We would race each other often throughout the year over cross country and road.  Looking back now, what was surprising was that our positions within the races relative to the other runners we knew well, especially the runners from the Hutt Valley part of the Wellington Centre would remain pretty consistent, pretty well regardless of what physical training we did.   While in Wellington last month, I had a great night having a 'beer or two' with one of the real 'character' runners from the Hutt, Gerard Maarhuis along with a few other runners.  As one does after a few beers, one reminisces about old times.  How so and so used to always beat ....  From a distance, it all appears clearer now.  Our performances were so consistent over the years, because our expectations were largely based on the previous race.  I used to finish around 25th - 35th in a Centre race, usually a wee bit behind Gerard, who would usually finish a wee bit behind training partner Steve Hunt.  As we reminisced last month I think we could only recall me beating Gerard once, and Gerard never beating Steve over the many years of racing, even though in terms of finish times, there wasn't much between me and Gerard, and then not much between Gerard and Steve.  We simply expected to be beaten by them, or to beat them.  As much as we hoped, we wished that we could beat them, I now believe our performances were largely determined by our 'deep down' self expectations!  Although the shorter the race, the greater the emphasis on the physiology, self expectations still play a role in determining performance.  As the duration of the race increases, the importance of self expectations becomes more substantial.

So as I prepare for 2011, and the excitement of races to come, I hope to gain a lot from my summer training camp in New Zealand.  Yes, the increase in mileage as I enjoyed the sunshine, should provide some physical benefits.  But I think the mains benefits will arise from the reflection that has taken place whilst reminiscing about old times, on some great runs from the past, with some great friends.

To all of you out there as you plan for 2011, a mixed message to sign off with;  "Give some consideration to your self expectations.  Do they need changing?  But remember to keep things in perspective.  Yes, the performance does matter, but the enjoyment gained from not only the running, but from the friendships made along the way, in the 'long run' is what matters the most!"  Stuart Mills, 2011.

A belated Happy New Year to you all,

Stuart